- Breach of Rules
- Requesting Lock
- Other
10 Replies
Lipuro 
Posts: 1715 Replies: 1609
Nope. Not buying it.
Hayden
Posts: 358 Replies: 704
The reality of the situation is that everything they said in the article was statistically correct. When you look past the numbers, they only exist because of the availability of SoF at any time. con
Hayden
Posts: 358 Replies: 704
The majority of hate on SoF is directed towards the buying spins aspect, which was almost entirely excluded from Jagex's response. Putting in that combat rework at the end was a nice tactic, though.
SuPa
Posts: 219 Replies: 383
^It was entirely excluded, except for the whole paragraph about it...
Lipuro
Posts: 1715 Replies: 1609
^ I actually made a topic about that part being excluded in which that topic was locked.
I agree. The problem is the buying aspect, which really wasnt addressed.
zant
Posts: 607 Replies: 924
Moral of the story, they are not going to remove SoF, they are not going to remove buyable spins. We are just going to have to deal with it. People say this game is dying because of it... cont
zant
Posts: 607 Replies: 924
In reality, its not, I enjoy SoF with the free spins you get and I think its a good idea. 120k people online is not a game that is dying. This is probably the best way RWT could be done in RS
Lipuro
Posts: 1715 Replies: 1609
Though the game it self isn't dying, the integrity is.
Estor
Posts: 253 Replies: 450
LOL They say people are appreciating it with 90% of mems/70% of F2P using it, well yeah it's free stuff but people hate it, and they said that people haven't been abusing it.... >_>