Do you support homosexual?

addiv · **Posted:** December 23rd, 2008, 7:08 pm

I don't have a problem with it. It bothers me that something as innocent as who you fall in love with can generate such hatred. Isn't finding the right person hard enough without bigotry stepping in?

Religious views on this baffle me as well. Adultery is a huge problem in our society but it doesn't get a fraction of the attention. Good plan though; alienate part of the population and keep them out of the church while ignoring the sins of your tithe paying congregation.

Its not a disease just because you don't understand it. I'll never understand why one man would even want to fall in love with another but I'm not so stupid as to think they need a 'cure'.

Adbot · **Posted:** December 23rd, 2008, 7:08 pm

Total Plox · **Posted:** December 23rd, 2008, 7:52 pm

CreepyPirate wrote:

I'm all for lesbians but guy on guy can get the hell out of here. It's sick and disgusting that they feel the need to do such horrible, immoral things especially in public.

I saw two guys kissing once and nearly threw up, so i went up and punched them in the face for being a disgrace to mankind itself

+1000, I don't care if you were joking...

I can't stand the overly *** people. You know, the *** people who have to go around telling everyone they're *** for attention? If you wanna have *** with guy in your own house, have fun, but there's no need to tell everyone. Do I go around making everyone sure that I'm straight? Is there a straight-pride parade I can go to somewhere? It's disgusting how much *** people think they deserve just because they're ***. Suddenly we have to incorporate *** people in every media slot there is. I thought we're supposed to treat *** people just like everyone else? So why does every *** person make a point of telling us how *** they are? And why do *** people have to dress and talk differently? Does liking men mean that you have to talk like a teenage girl, and wear pink clothes and whatever else they do?

But yeah, I'm all for lesbians, as long as they're hot.

Shreder · **Posted:** December 23rd, 2008, 9:07 pm

i hate them.
personally if I saw a really homo person walking down the street i'd hit them.
I don't know why they **** me off so much. they just do.

I think we should export all of them in america and send them to China.
in a couple decades, their population problem will be solved.

Mushroom Queen · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 1:01 am

There are worse things in the world than homosexuals. Nonetheless, their behaviour is inherently wrong and I don't think that their lifestyle should be supported to include marriage and adoption.

Most homosexuals do not marry into the accepted idea of marriage. Why do we get married? Well, marriage is the act of choosing your partner for life and possibly having children with them. The idea of infidelity in heterosexual relationships, while it occurs, is looked at with disdain by the majority of society. Many homosexuals, especially men, are rarely interested in monogamous relationships (even in marriage) and often commit adultery without scorn from their spouses. This wouldn't be so much of a problem, save for the fact that homosexual men statistically less likely to use safer *** practices, making AIDS an unfortunate repercussion of their choices.

The argument "Why do you care, it's none of your business" isn't relevant when homosexuality is a societal problem. It creates discord with traditional gender roles on the most basic fundamentals of reproduction and fidelity. Most gays aren't "just like everyone else". They may be nice, kind people, but their actions in themselves threaten the gifts given to us by God/nature/whatever you believe in.

Veggie Eater · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 12:06 pm

Mushroom Queen, I found what you had to say to be quite ignorant.

I know several *** couples that have been dating and stayed faithful for longer than you have been alive.

I'd like to know how you got your information that many *** people do not want to stay in a monogamous relationship. That's just very stereotypical. Like people who get on a runescape forum do not have a life. Or that black people enjoy kool aid and fried chicken more than anyone else.

And based on your argument that couples get married to have children:

What about women that are barren? Should they never get married because they cannot bear children? What about men that are sterile?

It is obvious that you are basing your views on 'statistics' and not real life experiences and we all know how everyone can warp statistics to prove their point.

The same arguments were raised while interracial marriage was being protested.

I'm pretty sure years down the road people will look back on *** discrimination and view it as very odd. It's just like when people thought black's should be "separate but equal". I'm appalled by the thought of such discrimination but many people thought that it was acceptable.

I'm all for people having their own beliefs, but it really makes me angry when your beliefs affect strangers in a negative way.

Total Plox · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 1:53 pm

Inter-racial marriage is actually completely different. People don't choose their race, they are born that way. I'm a strong believer that *** people are the result of their environment. Why are we all of sudden seeing such a rise in the amount of *** people? Sure you could argue that people are now finding it acceptable to reveal that they're ***, but that's a bunch of ******* to me. People become ***, they aren't born that way. Whether it be from a disfunctional childhood or they think being *** will make them part of a group or whatever, people are not born ***. And I'm not trying to say that people become *** to be part of something, I believe there are genuine *** people out there, just not as much as we're lead to believe.

Anyways, as I said before, being *** is a choice, you're skin colour is not. I'll never look back on *** protesting and see that it is odd or silly that people would protest something like that. Like MQ said, marriage is for the sole purpose of procreation. And back tp my previous point, men and women who are sterile do not choose that, they have no control over it, so marriage shouldn't be shunned for them.

It's funny though, these types of topics. The only real point of them is for arguments. You'll never change my opinion and I'll never change your opinion, so what's the point of even discussing it?

Adbot · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 1:53 pm

Veggie Eater · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 2:25 pm

Do you really think people choose to be cast out in society, to be made fun of, to be completely different than everyone else?

No!

They are born that way. It has been scientifically proven that there is something different about their brains in a sense. Like a *** man's brain is more similar to a woman's.

I don't know much about it, but I remember hearing something about it.

Bogrollbloke · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 2:55 pm

I have a few *** friends. 3 lesbians, and a *** fella, who is actually one of those flamboyant, camp *** kids.

They're all really nice people, I don't care what they do when I'm not around. I don't treat them any differently because they're ***, if anything I can have a joke with them more than other people calling them puffs, or saying I hate homos, when I quite clearly don't.

Although I do know a couple of *** lads who I really, really do not like. I'm not going into why I don't like them, but it's safe to say they don't shut up about it, and use it as an excuse to certain things.

You're right it isn't natural, but you can say that about a lot of things. I don't understand how anyone can feel so strongly about it unless they've been harassed by a *** fella, or something. If you do feel so strongly about it, do you feel so strongly about people who have *** with animals, that is what is unnatural.

Rapidash · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 3:54 pm

Veggie Eater wrote:

Do you really think people choose to be cast out in society, to be made fun of, to be completely different than everyone else?

No!

They are born that way. It has been scientifically proven that there is something different about their brains in a sense. Like a *** man's brain is more similar to a woman's.

I don't know much about it, but I remember hearing something about it.

Lol. Before you go calling people like MQ names and bashing them for not providing a works cited page for her post, please do the same yourself prior to commanding others to carry out your wishes.

Back on topic, in my opinion homosexuality is a disturbing, grotesque and unnatural mindset. Are they born with it? Perhaps they are. But that proves it to be natural and acceptable in no way whatsoever. Mutations occur, as someone has pointed out before, though this is probably not the reason; humans can think for themselves, the brain can decide to believe what it wants. If the person was born with it, it certainly is not normal. And although I do not agree with everything Darwin says, his beliefs are ones that pro-homos usually also support due to their agnostic and/or atheist views. For example, Natural Selection is a process by which unfavorable traits die out naturally because they were unfavorable - it is self-explanatory. So if you argue that homosexuality is a natural mindset, not a mutation or change from anything else deemed normal, by Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection, the homosexuals will not be able to survive naturally. However since we are humans, the only sentient species on this planet, that hasn't happened because homosexuality is not natural in this sense.

Why not? Possibly because as the young develops, it gets smarter. As it gets smarter, it can think and make choices. As it thinks, it may get the idea that little Robbie over there eye-ing him from across the classroom is thinking the same thing as him - "Wow, forget Suzie..he has a great ***."

Anubis · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 4:21 pm

I'm assuming that Homosexuality is completely biological and/or genetic.

A mutation doesn't just occur because it's 'needed'. One can be favourable or unfavourable. Natural Selection works in the way that the organism with the more advantageous mutation(s) or indeed those without an unfavourable one will survive whilst the others die out. If we seperated Homosexuals and Heterosexuals from each other in a kind of apartheid, Homosexuals wouldn't die out simply because more are born from those of us which are straight. Much like those with Down's Syndrome or Cystic Fibrosis. Down's Syndrome is caused by a lack of chromosome in the carrier's cells and whilst it's quite obvious not a similar mutation causes Homosexuality (because we'd know), it's not unreasonable to believe that it is caused by a mutated or simply different allele - like in Cystic Fibrosis. Homosexuality could be a recessive gene.

I don't believe we're able to cure it. Yet. I believe we should stretch our resources in order to attempt it, but there's no reason whatsoever to live as if they're scum.

Sev · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 4:47 pm

Being homosexual is fine, as long as it's not towards me.

Veggie Eater · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 6:08 pm

Rapidash wrote:

Lol. Before you go calling people like MQ names and bashing them for not providing a works cited page for her post, please do the same yourself prior to commanding others to carry out your wishes.

"Lol." I never called Mushroom Queen a name. I said I found what she posted to be ignorant.

And I admitted I didn't know much about what I was suggesting and didn't try to use big words to prove I know everything about it.

Blahh. I'm done. I just wish people that say how "unnatural" it is would understand it is natural for *** people. My best friend tried dating girls so a) people would stop making fun of him and b) so maybe he could 'change' but it didn't work.

I really wish people were more accepting. Maybe it's not the gays that are 'ruining' society. Maybe it's all the people that are so narrow-minded and hateful.

Total Plox · **Posted:** December 24th, 2008, 10:30 pm

I didn't even bother reading what anyone else said, I'd just like to point out something. Like I said earlier, being *** has become more socially acceptable in the last few years, I highly doubt that being *** results in being socially outcast anymore. If that were so, we wouldn't see the huge increase in the amount of *** people that we have been seeing. So the fact that you say "why would people choose to be *** if only to be, in turn, outcast from society" is just wrong. Being *** is acceptable now, *** people aren't "different" than everyone else because they have a huge amount of other *** people to turn to.

Quote:
It has been scientifically proven that there is something different about their brains in a sense.

I'm not even going to bother looking up a resource for this, because I know it's all theory. I think it's the environment that creates a *** person, not some defect (yes, defect) in their brain.

Gontcha · **Posted:** December 25th, 2008, 5:31 am

I'll be honest, I don't care. I cannot stand overly/effeminate gays. If I'd see a couple kissing, well, I'd try to look away.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater, I have a *** friend, but he isn't acting like the stereotypic image most of us have. He's a big fan of heavy metal, that says enough

jointntoday · **Posted:** December 25th, 2008, 11:48 am

meh, i dont care. i dont 'support' them, nor do i hate them. i just dont care. its not my life to live. its theirs and they can have it.

all i can say about gays is my aunts were ***, and they raised 3 boys. 1 is in iraq now, and one was there for 15 months then stayed over sea's for 12 more months only a few months after comeing home from war. so anyone who say's gays cant raise kids is a dumb ****.

i was raised not to hate someone unless i have a **** good reason. i dont see what they do 'in bed' to be a good reason to hate them, as long as they keep it to them selfs.