PS3 vs. Wii

Ranging God · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 9:02 am

Wii, and it will only cost $250.00

Adbot · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 9:02 am

Jaden · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 11:06 am

The reason why I choose PS3 over Wii is because I play the types of games that Wii does not support. But instead of these two consoles I love 360. Instead of the 360 I majorly love computers. Nothing beats a computer, honestly...

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 12:05 pm

Lol, i think that settles the 'who's console is graphically Superior' argument.

Two exactly the same screenshots from the 360 and ps3. As you can see they both have faults. Rather funny really the ps3 can do long distance but can't manage midrange. XD

The 360 can't manage long distance. Interesting, still without trying to bash the ps3 to much, if i was paying 600 for it, I'd expect the graphics (lets face it, that's what you're paying for) to do better than the 360.

Bogrollbloke · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 1:05 pm

Wii.

Zelda and Farcry both look outstanding. Pre-ordered mine.

MattVortex · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 2:07 pm

The PS3 is the most powerful video games console ever made. A processor with nine cores that delivers 2.18 teraflops of processor power is immense. Its almost a supercomputer.

The Wii is the most revolutionary video games console ever made. With its motion-sensing remote, the ability to truly interact with your environment is amazing.

Nintendo are, and always have been revolutionary. Sony have been the ones following along behind, making games that look pretty, but the gameplay factor is terrible.

Im with Nintendo, and the Wii. The Wii didnt have to be called the Revolution to be a revolution.

Jay · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 5:33 pm

Wii ftw, PS3 = same thing, suped up graphics and +400 bucks.

Adbot · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 5:33 pm

The Killer · **Posted:** November 14th, 2006, 10:06 pm

MasterOfTheVortex wrote:

The Wii didnt have to be called the Revolution to be a revolution.

QFT

Tjbartz2009 · **Posted:** November 15th, 2006, 3:24 pm

Wii

Nintendo has been the system that's been around the longest. NES came out before I was born I really have no clue what year. But Playstation came out in I think it was 1995-1996. Nintendo holds seniority rule over any system...

Also Wii announced their motion controlled controllers before it even came out they leaked out their "special" controller. Then when Playstation changed their boomerang controller to the standard analog one they put a motion sensor in there to make it interesting.

connor10238 · **Posted:** November 15th, 2006, 6:36 pm

I hate sony, cuz PS2 has all the lame shooter games and XBox has all the best shooter games, but i'd have to go with PS3 because i hate Nintendo systems. The gamecube was a pretty crappy system, and PlayStation 2 has better games and graphics. I hope the PS3 has better graphics than ps2. Anyways, i'd have to say PS3 is best.

Karl 67 · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 7:34 am

Wii wins right off the bat.

First off, It's cheap like everyone else says it.

Secondly, The wii is much more easier to make fun of with puns; and I'm NOT stating any examples.

Thirdly, its coming out November 19th for North America. (This Sunday, WOO!)

Lastly, Twilight Princess and Metroid: Corruption, 'nuff said.

Besides, The local Best Buy has people camping there just for a PS3. That also proves how bad it can get. If it's in such high demand, why would Sony just make it right?

Will it even play Halo 3 or Halo Wars? I think not. That's why I'm also planning to get a 360.

Cowboyofdeath · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 3:10 pm

PS3

Why?

Blu-Ray Player, supercomputer Cell Processor, 7 players simultaneiously, dual video output, default wireless controller, free integrated Wi-Fi, super kewl graphics, CALL OF DUTY 3 (yay) etc.

Why not Wii?

Excessively stupid name, kiddy games (Mario is old), to play on it you'l need to flail your amrs around like an idiot (the Wiimote is a joke for first person shooters. It's heck trying to use them to aim)

Why not 360?

uh.....unreliable? nah i dont really care for 360

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 3:47 pm

PS3 aren't going to have enough consoles on release date, far to difficult to make so there taking forever to create.

I really can't stand the generalisem about the wii being for kids, it's that one point that bugs me. It has 10+ M rated games coming out for it on release date, i believe.

Besides, the kids games are awesome, mario keeps me entertained.

Tjbartz2009 · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 4:24 pm

Creepy you just gave me another awsome reason to buy the Wii.

Alrite take this into consideration...

You go out and buy both the PS3 and Wii. You play all the games you had for each system and beat them(whether they were hard or not). Now PS3 being a system which is supposed to be hardcore will of course have a few more games that will be different. The Wii having the "kiddy" games makes it more fun.

So what I'm tryin to get at is if you bought a Wii you wouldn't get bored because the kiddy games never get old. There always little tid bits to unlock and see.

Jaden · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 5:16 pm

Cowboyofdeath wrote:

PS3

Why?

Blu-Ray Player, supercomputer Cell Processor, 7 players simultaneiously, dual video output, default wireless controller, free integrated Wi-Fi, super kewl graphics, CALL OF DUTY 3 (yay) etc.

Why not Wii?

Excessively stupid name, kiddy games (Mario is old), to play on it you'l need to flail your amrs around like an idiot (the Wiimote is a joke for first person shooters. It's heck trying to use them to aim)

Why not 360?

uh.....unreliable? nah i dont really care for 360

I'm with you Cowboyofdeath. I agree with you on everything you have said. Also, to include something in your list of PS3 specs: the wireless sony controllers are bluetooth. Well one exception: I own a Xbox 360 for many reasons *cough* Halo 3 *cough*. Umm yeah..

Bogrollbloke · **Posted:** November 16th, 2006, 5:19 pm

Cowboyofdeath wrote:

Why not Wii?

Excessively stupid name, kiddy games (Mario is old), to play on it you'l need to flail your amrs around like an idiot (the Wiimote is a joke for first person shooters. It's heck trying to use them to aim)

You are allowed to buy yourself a new remote that doesn't have the motion sensor in.

You can't discriminate against something when you have the option to change it, that's just stupid.

Also look at the new Wii game line up. Farcry for example, a launch title FPS which looks pretty amazing.

Sorry, but you're just wrong in your descision if those are your reasons.