Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: [Informer Article] The Ethics of Pay-to-Win
PostPosted: January 23rd, 2014, 5:02 pm 
Rsbandb Donor
User avatar
Offline

Joined: October 13th, 2005, 9:18 pm
Posts: 3350
Location: USA us
RS Name: Duke Juker
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Clan Quest
For some reason, people are ethical... meaning they are aware of and concerned with the rightness and wrongness of actions. This recognition of right and wrong (or moral compass as it were) is something that distinguishes humans from all other life. We even have rules in place for many job fields such as medicine and accounting concerning ethical conduct. However, for most people, choosing to live rightly or wrongly comes down to a personal choice. But not every issue or action falls clearly on the side of being either right or wrong. Inevitably, this leads to conflict and disagreement over the issue of ethical behavior. When it comes to gaming, there is no greater ethical issue that comes to mind other than Pay-to-Win games.

What is Pay-to-Win?

For those who aren't familiar with the term, a Pay-to-Win game is simply a game which provides players an option to spend real life money in return for some kind of advantage in said game over other players who don't pay. If that's still not clear, the highly trusted and reliable Urban Dictionary has two other definitions of Pay-to-Win that may help. The first is "Games that let you buy better gear or allow you to make better items then everyone else at a faster rate and then makes the game largely unbalanced even for people who have skill in the game without paying." The second definition is not as helpful and provides more of a cynical view of games of this nature: "The sad truth of the free-to-play business model." To be clear, Pay-to-Win in the simplest terms has to do with a player gaining a measurable advantage over another player that can only be obtained by paying real life money. Cosmetic items and other objects available through real life purchase in a game that do not give a measurable advantage to a paying player over non-paying players are by and large not considered to be problematic or unethical by most gamers or the author of this article.

What's the main ethical accusation of Pay-to-Win?

What is the ethical dilemma of Pay-to-Win? Is it even an ethical issue in the first place? First, let's consider what the main objective of a game is. Typically, people play games for enjoyment or entertainment. So long as a game meets the basic requirement of providing enjoyment or entertainment, then players are satisfied. However, when another player playing the same game has an "unfair" advantage, then there is an issue. This usually comes into play in multiplayer games where gamers are playing the same game and are pitted against each other in a sort of competitive environment. When more than one player plays the same game and is compared against others, then the idea of fairness becomes a major issue.

Gamers are very strict and immovable when it comes to the idea of fairness. If a player is suspected to be cheating, hacking, scamming, or otherwise doing something to gain an unfair advantage, other players get very angry very quickly. But why? If we've established that a game is about enjoyment or entertainment, what does it matter what other people do even if it's considered unfair? Many of us have experienced and it should be obvious. Players do not like to feel their game play belittled by the unfair play of another. This belittling, however trifling or serious, ultimately detracts from any personal enjoyment or entertainment that may be gained by players.

So, now that we understand gamers' belief in a level playing field, let us consider the ethics of fairness. The general consensus in society is that it's better to be fair than not to be fair. It is fair that two friends share a $20 they find on the ground than one friend keep it for himself. It is fair that the rich pay more taxes than the poor because they have more money. It is fair that a male and female worker get paid the same amount for doing the same job. Yet, we see unfairness everywhere in many different ways. It's not fair that if you didn't get your homework in on time that you should be allowed to turn it in later and still receive a grade. It's not fair for someone to cut in line at the store. It's not fair that some people can get away with a crime while other's get caught. Fairness, as it cannot be absolutely enforced, is often an unrealized hope. But nevertheless, it doesn't mean we don't think of fairness in right or wrong terms.

Ethically speaking, anything a person does that gives them an unfair advantage over another person in regards to performing the same task, completing a goal, achieving an accomplishment, or getting further ahead in a career field is generally considered as being wrong. It's not fair (and not right) that a person gain an advantage over another person through means not available to all. What is right is that people have equal opportunity to achieve regardless of external factors. This is why we have rules against athletes using PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs), insider trading on the stock market, or accountants fudging tax returns to name a few instances

What would this look like if it were applied to gaming? If all players were to have equal opportunity to achieve, Pay-to-Win could not exist. The influence of real life factors would have to be eliminated to keep a fair playing field. Pay-to-Win gives an unfair advantage to players who just so happen to have more money than everyone else to throw around. Money shouldn't determine who the best is or who can get the farthest. Games are about having fun and investing time. Pay-to-Win takes away the fun and reduces the time invested, causing at the very least a feeling of dissatisfaction with the ease of achieving goals.

Conclusion

Is Pay-to-Win an ethical issue? I would assert yes it is... and it's a bad issue at that. Pay-to-Win takes away from purpose of a game: enjoyment and entertainment. It focuses attention on external factors, not personal time and effort invested into a game to achieve a goal. Not only does it anger and belittle gamers who play fairly, but it also takes away from the gamers themselves who participate in paying to gain an advantage. What fun is a game if you can pay money to reach a goal or level faster? If anything, it only implies that you are so lazy to play or work hard to achieve in a game that you need the help of external factors to do what others can without those factors. To gaming companies themselves, it's an easy way to make more money. To gamers, it's a way to achieve without actually having to do as much as everyone else.

This was originally posted as an Informer Gaming article.

_________________
Image
RSBANDBInformer! Gaming Writer: 08/31/2011-09/30/15
RSBandB Donor since 07/01/2010
82nd Dragon Member since 05/12/2010
RSBandB Member #517
Current Activities: Ports, Dailies/Monthlies, DXP
Skill Masteries: Firemaking, Cooking, Woodcutting, Fletching, Mining, Agility, Prayer, Smithing, Fishing, Summoning, Construction, Herblore, Hunter, Thieving, Crafting, Divination, Dungeoneering, Farming, Runecrafting, Slayer, Magic, Ranged, Defence, Constitution, Attack, Strength, Invention, All Skills 99 (3/9/19)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear
PostPosted: January 23rd, 2014, 5:02 pm 
Rsbandb Donor

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 1:47am
Posts: 9047
Location: In your web browserz


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: [Informer Article] The Ethics of Pay-to-Win
PostPosted: January 24th, 2014, 10:10 am 
Chat Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: December 15th, 2006, 4:43 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: G.A., USA us
RS Name: Firemana
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Problem Solvers
Good article, Duke, and I agree.

_________________
.:: The Legend of The Sword :: FaceBook : Google+ : Twitter ::.
Image
::
88th Dragon Member : Informer Writer : Content Crew : Chat Moderator ::
"If it ain't broke, dun fix it."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: [Informer Article] The Ethics of Pay-to-Win
PostPosted: February 7th, 2014, 4:34 pm 
Chat Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: April 29th, 2010, 11:42 am
Posts: 340
Location: Yanille ca
RS Name: Uncle Dano
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Knights of Honour
Completely agree. Wonderful article. I couldn't have said it better myself. What pay to win actually does as well is devalue your ultimate achievement - the skillcape. If there is an option to gain an extra in game advantage simply by paying cash, then the playing field is not level. You now have to wonder if that skillcape was bought or honestly earned. I know for sure, and for my own satisfaction, that my skillcapes were the result of my own hard work and not bought. My skillcapes are "pure" and not contaminated by short cuts bought with real world money. Your levels should reflect your skill in the game, not your personal real world finances. There is no honour in that, plain and simple.

_________________
Godspeed, and another fine day in The Scape!
Image
12 99's on 12/12/12!
Web: Uncle Dano's RS Wiki | RS Hiscores: Uncle Dano


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: