Mac. For the following reasons: Software provided, OS, customer service, and durability. That for me is enough to warrant the extra money.
Al3X wrote:
ryan1 wrote:
Windows.
Not that I have any particular aversion to Macs (other than the fact that my friend who has one won't shut the hell up about how awesome Macs are and how they don't get viruses (even though they *will* start to get viruses written for them once enough people start using them (though at least 90%+ of computers probably run Windows still)), even though he knows nothing about computers, and his eyes would probably glaze over if you asked him simple questions like how much RAM his miracle machine has).
Basically the same situation for me. The only difference is the friend is my cousin and her parents.
told them that makes in fact can get viruses, but no one writes them because they would rather infect the majority not a minority. Their loss when people decided to start writing them. Even if it isn't harmful, if someone made a .bat file kind of thing for macs, so many people would freak out and have no idea what to do.

They can
get viruses but they're pretty much stuck on the system unless the user does something. In order to cause any real damage the user would have to be stupid enough to enter their username and password. A default admin user can't modify the /System folder without entering their password. "If someone made a .bat file kind of thing" (called a shell script on a Unix based os) that script would have the same security constraints as I mentioned previously with modifying system files, you'd need to enter your password.