Duke Juker wrote:
King Kulla wrote:
Duke Juker wrote:
I think the difference to not is that the meat in a burger is cooked and usually served hot, whereas a sandwich will be served cold with cold cuts and other various things. If you want to go by technicalities, you can call it a sandwich, but in all honesty, a burger is a burger because of the patty you are putting in it. That's what makes it not a pure sandwich.
A grilled cheese sandwich is hot. A toasted sandwich is also hot.
But we call it a burger because of linguistic slang from when they were first "invented" that has carried over into our modern vernacular.
But you can't just call it a meat sandwich. There are also sloppy joes and other types of meat "sandwichs" to choose from. Although, now that I think about it, can't you just call a burger a special type of sandwich. I mean, the same can be said for subs and other deli dishes. But I want to call it a sub or burger because that's what I understand it as and they aren't intrinsically like a sandwich in nature. The broader you make the specifications for a sandwich, the more gray are you are creating.

What's stopping us from calling it a meat sandwich? You basically agreed with me - cultural norms have cause most of the western world to call it a burger. So, we call it a burger. However, we could have easily called it something else had circumstances been different.
What I'm saying is that it essentially is a sandwich because of components, but we call it a burger, because that way we can linguistically group more "sandwiches" into the "burger group", such as a cheeseburger, or baconburger, etc.