Total Plox wrote:
I disagree that if a 13 year old has enlisted in the help of her mother in order to raise the child it should still be encouraged to have an abortion. If the mother decides she wants to keep the baby and has help to raise it, why should she be forced to give it up? But even the idea of having an abortion because you can't raise the child shouldn't be allowed. If the mother is unfit to raise a child, or doesn't have a sufficient amount of help or money, the child can always be put up for adoption. The girl made the decision to have *** and now she can face the consequences.
No, I don't believe the system should be supportive of children who get pregnant at all. The legal age for consent, in the UK, is 16. This means that anyone under the age of 16 is actually breaking the law if they engage in intercourse. You do not see, though, anyone being sent to a criminal trial because of this though. The law is exceptionally lenient and I think that's wrong. because of this, I feel it is necessary for the welfare of children to have stricter laws surrounding teenage pregnancy and abortion. By introducing harsher punishments and deterants from having ***, especially
unprotected ***, teenage pregnancies will lower and government money will be saved for better purposes.
Parents who are willing to aid their daughter(s) in raising a child are irresponsible. Teenage pregnancies do not happen simply because the girl is a ****. They may happen in the case of rape, accident, a poor upbringing... or the girl's a slag. Accepting the idea that your thirteen year old duaghter is pregnant and allowing her to keep the child will quite honestly ruin their life and their child's. I wouldn't say an eighteen or twenty-one year old would be ready to have children seriously, let alone thirteen year old Shannon who's failing classes and works part-time at the local Walmart.
Total Plox wrote:
The only time I'd see abortion being allowed is if a girl was raped. No girl should have to bear a child that she never intended to have and was forced upon her. Other than that, I don't think abortion should ever be discussed before adoption. I actually don't think abortion should be legal in any other case than rape.
If it's not the girl's fault that they're pregnant then they should be allowed to have an abortion, yes. But abortion is there because
it is not an issue over whether the foetus should be concieved, or binned. It's a case over whether the parent's want the baby, and/or whether they'll be able to adequately raise it. I have very strong opinions that those who are incapable of raising children should not be allowed to have any.
Total Plox wrote:
As for your theoretical question, I just don't ever see that happening, but in the world we live in today anything is possible. In a logical sense, the father would have no legal obligation whatsoever to pay child support or to raise the child. I can't see him being convicted for neglect or whatever else for not caring for a baby if he was raped. By the way, I've never really looked into it, but are there actually cases of males being raped?
In some countries, such as Scotland, Rape is gender specific - women cannot 'rape' men. There have been cases in which women have been convicted of raping a man though; sometimes with the use of an 'object'.

I implore you to look on the wikipedia articles; i'm sure an in depth discussion on this could be seen as innapropriate. :p