New popout sig C+C pls

Brandt · **Posted:** June 8th, 2006, 4:30 pm

Tell me wat u think, made 4 a friend C+C pls:

Adbot · **Posted:** June 8th, 2006, 4:30 pm

Mushroom Queen · **Posted:** June 8th, 2006, 8:19 pm

Ok. You seem to be having issues with text. The text on this is just strange. A technique I use (and a lot of others use) is to have the name in your ultra-cool font, but then have the subtext in a smaller default font. It looks a lot better that way, I think.

The border. The border is lopsided, the bottom part is too thick. I think the blue colour is a bit weird also. Maybe try a darker shade of turquoise.

The render. This is a neat render! By looking at the sort of 3D hand, it makes me want to suggest a darker background for your sig rather than this light-coloured fractal one. Also, I woulnd't recommend this as pop-out since you can't see the edge of his cape. Pop-outs should have a complete render with no cut-offs.

In short, there are some weird flaws in this sig dealing with colour and text..but the render is cool and I think this could be fixed up into a better sig.

Tjbartz2009 · **Posted:** June 8th, 2006, 10:38 pm

Haha I had nothing else better to do so I did an example of what MQ said...

Mushroom Queen · **Posted:** June 8th, 2006, 10:59 pm

tjbartz2009 wrote:

Haha I had nothing else better to do so I did an example of what MQ said...

That looks cool

.. aw, the cape is still cut off!

Kwt Worker · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 12:52 am

Both are cool! but i still prefer the second one...

~Your's Kwt

Tjbartz2009 · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 9:33 am

This is death's thread talk about his sig not mine :wink:

Adbot · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 9:33 am

Shigeto · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 12:29 pm

Both are better than anything i could do, but i do agree with MQ - i'm sure you can and hopefully will upgrade this sig making it look even better than it already is, hopefully if/when you do, post it so we can see

thief18954 · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 1:26 pm

That's not even a pop-out. Pop-outs are things that make it look like the render is *popping* out of the signature. What you did goes against both signatures and pop-outs...

Doesn't look too good, render isn't really... Suitable.. Monotone - boring, text is really stand-out-ish, and the background is dull.

durty diap3r · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 1:45 pm

Kwt Worker wrote:

Both are cool! but i still prefer the second one...

~Your's Kwt

i agree!

Bogrollbloke · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 2:59 pm

Erm, i'm not eacgfly sober right now, so in the morning i'll edit my post, but MQ is right, the bottom shouldnt be cut off bec\use it is a popout sig, and the text is the same as everything e;se..

O know this isnt a good example t others, but meh...

Brandt · **Posted:** June 9th, 2006, 3:46 pm

thxs bartz..the main reason I cant do a background like that is cause I haven't fully gotten used to GIMP yet, after I do I will be able to make better bkgs

drewdawgg · **Posted:** June 10th, 2006, 10:09 am

Ok,
You have to learn that size is a big factor, too big is bad, but if you do dicide to make a 'big' sig you might as well put all of your effort into it. As far as I can see is there is one brush in it.

The text is WAY TO BASIC. You need it to be to not big, and I suggest you put a bit of animation in it. Just a flashy text.

Ok border, obviously the border is ummm differant.

And the pop out render cut's off, it's like the guy is jumping out at me with no leg's, you get what I mean.

You can make the best sig's if you learned just a bit more in computer art. Keep up the great work, and remember sucess is made from learning from your mistakes

Brandt · **Posted:** June 10th, 2006, 11:51 am

the cut off isn't really my fault...its the render's cut off....neways. bartz, you think you can pm me on how to do a cutout in GIMP?

drewdawgg · **Posted:** June 10th, 2006, 11:53 am

Ohhh I have a great site for render's if you'd like

http://www.gamerenders.com

Brandt · **Posted:** June 10th, 2006, 1:03 pm

so do I..I have bout 4 sites...