New Section Suggestion

I want this site to create a Debate Section

Here is how it goes

Goals: to understand what is currently happening in the world, to increase ability of debating each other

I'll be posting rules after section created, please vote above if you like this idea or not

Ok, so basicly, i'll post topics to debate on, or you will, which i suggest you not to because i know what's appropriate and what's not, I've done debate before, anyways this is like a congress style, which each person post and insert what they have to say and their point of view

AFter the bill is said, you can choose to go either on affirmative side(the side that you agree the bill should be passed) or negative side(the side that you agree the bill should not be passed)

Also, inserting Evidence in your posts IS A MUST!! YOU can't say your opinions or ur rumors, You need to put in facts..

If you got questions please ask.


Here would be an example

First post by me
A resolution to allow Naturalized citizens to serve as president of the United states-National
Whereas: many naturalized citizens have been shown to be as loyal or even more loyal to the United States than many natural-born citizens, and
Whereas: at the current time, naturalized american citizens are denied the right to run for president even if they have lived the vast majority of their lives in the United States, and
Whereas: in the past, many naturalized American citizens have provided the government of the United States with exemplary leadership, and
Whereas:naturalized american citizens retain all other rights and responsibilities that are afforded to natural-born citizens.
THERE FOR, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CONGRESS
ASSEMBLED THAT:The United States Constitution be amended to allow naturalized citizens to be eligible to serve as presidents of United States


second post by mini-me
I would like to affirm the resolution because following reasons
1st: blahblahblah, arnold schawzzengeger was a good governer, he could run for president,
then blahblahblah

and third post by No name
I would like to negate the resolution because following reasons
1st: they could be terrorists, that could kill our country
then blahblahblah, but then you have to attack the statements the first person said, like arnold schawzzengeger is not a good governer, cause he swears that makes bad influences on children

also if you have questions please ask

and when u post evidence, please site the evidence
and cut it short, so we don't ahve to spend days reading it

We can also do this on current events like Iraq and fundings for tsunami, to make people understand why america should do certain things and shouldn't

its kinda confusing..but i thinnk i go for a "YES"

anything about f2p vs. p2p always will turn into a lot of flaming, as will a lot of other arguments... I don't know if this forum is a good idea.

hell yeah i would like to see a debat forum man that would be awsome im voting yes a defent yes

seems like when every i put the word [ DAN ], and [ DAN ] up, people tend to be more positive lol

Mod edit by Dan, the filters are there for a reason please dont try to bypass them

Got it, you are a good mod

debate is not flamming, u need facts for debate, for flamming you just speak random crp, and make non sense

Debate..You need like proof or evidence

http://runevillage.net/ThePub/viewforum ... fec77d63c0
here is an example of how it would work

i agree...not too much of an good idea...if peeps want to have a debate they can pm each other or go to a chat room