chris the wise wrote:
I don't agree with the PS3 becuase it took them about 3 years to copy the xbox 360.
Sorry, who came up with the idea of a slim console first? I can't say I care about the 360 anymore, after the **** Microsoft put me through, I have to say that the PS3 is the better "console" out there. If the game developers would stop blowing it off and actually worked on the PS3 version of a multiplatformed game, the graphics would blow away the 360. Besides, the PS3 doesn't break as often as the 360.
But then the PC comes into play. I wanted to leave it out because I wouldn't consider it a "console", but I'll talk about it anyway. The PC is only as good as the amount of money you can put into it. If you can't afford good graphics, you don't get good graphics, where as with the consoles, you basically have 3 choices. The low priced Wii with the iffy graphics, the medium priced Xbox 360 with the graphics that have basically reached their limit, or the high priced Playstation 3 that hasn't had their graphics limit tested in a long time. The PC is a console war all in it's own, which is why I kept it out.
Earth wrote:
Where is the N64 and the Dreamcast?
Isn't there an "other/older option"?
