Pfkninenines wrote:
Everyone's hardware tips seem solid in my opinion, but nobody has mentioned the software side. Ditch Microsoft Works if you can, unless you *really* need it. If you're looking for something on the cheap to compete with Office, stick with Open Office suplimitented with Windows Live Essentials.
If you have the option, ditch the free antivirus trials, and install Microsoft Security Essentials now that it's officially released. It's free from Microsoft, and it does run great and have good heuristics.
yea ill probably uninstall those if i cant opt outta getting them with the laptop. Thanks for reminding me of M.S.E. just installed it on my computers since they all still had free AVG which i didnt like all that much.
Chief Snake wrote:
Quad cores will have a slower overall clock speed but the performance will be twice that of a dual core of the same clock speed, effectively. Therefore a quad core would be the way to go if possible as it will be faster on the whole. Some applications are not optimised to utilise four cores effectively and therefore require a higher clock speed, meaning a higher-end dual core is preferable; usually the case with games.
just found out that laptops dont exactly carry quad cores. i looked up quad core and all i could find was desktop computers. Was talking to kirby in the clan chat and he basically said laptops dont really need quad core yet because it isnt really supposed to do a mass of projects all at once. soo back to the dual core i have in my option 1?
Also on the processing side of things...
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo Processor T6500 (2.1GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 800MHz FSB) is my first option... what does "2mb l2 cache", and "fsb mean mean really.. cause i beleive i can upgrade all the way to 6 mb. i know the GHz is measuring in speed.