Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Accurent pross speed??? Intel or AMD
PostPosted: May 15th, 2006, 2:10 pm 
Rsbandb Donor
Offline

Joined: October 16th, 2005, 3:14 pm
Posts: 4731
Location: Kasnas City us
RS Name: Azek
RS Status: P2P
Ok, we all know that Intel and AMD have a different way of telling the speed of there prossesors. Which one do you think is more accurent?? Intel or AMD. Please give a reson why...

Personally even though I like AMD I think Intel's is right becaue it has a more based speed instead of AMD which is a new kind of speed that is now 100% accurent.

AMD is awsome for gaming though.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear
PostPosted: May 15th, 2006, 2:10 pm 
Rsbandb Donor

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 1:47am
Posts: 9047
Location: In your web browserz


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 1:28 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: December 3rd, 2005, 8:59 pm
Posts: 1494
Location: ORGANS!!!! gb
RS Status: Classic
AMD > Intel. Dont argue.

In terms of speed, i dont know the exact figures, but if you take the AMD number (like 3100+ or whatever), then its roughly equal to the MHz of a Intel processor. For example:

AMD 3200 is about equal to Intel 3200MHz (or 3.2GHz)

Ive no idea on exact figures, and dont quote me on this.

In terms of accuracy, ive no idea, but id probably say AMD.

Just ignore Intel. Intel processors are only good for a huge servers. Otherwise they're sucky, and should be ignored.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 1:51 pm 
Rsbandb Donor
Offline

Joined: August 15th, 2005, 10:26 am
Posts: 487 us
RS Name: zappbravo
RS Status: F2P
Everyone does intel because it seems to be cheaper than AMD, but right now, My AMD is working alot better than my past Intels. :)

_________________
[center]Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 1:51 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: March 17th, 2005, 11:44 pm
Posts: 1197
Location: Georgia, USA us
RS Name: Deborahone
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Elven Alliance
I'm not sure which has the most accurate speeds but I think the AMD proccessors are the best.

_________________
Image
Image
Image
Image
SOTW Judge (Sep 14, 2005 1:38 pm - Feb 06, 2009 8:58 pm)
Spoiler for Everything else:

Image
A Kid asked Jesus, "How much do you love me?" and Jesus said. "This much."
And spread his arms out on the cross and died.
If you believe that he did this for you put this in your signature.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 3:26 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 9th, 2005, 3:28 pm
Posts: 1052
Location: BRAINS!!!!!!!!
RS Name: thief121212
RS Status: P2P
AMDs, price efficient and work better than Intels.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 8:29 pm 
Steel Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: January 19th, 2006, 9:29 pm
Posts: 45
Location: With your MOM! LAWL... I need a life :(
RS Name: Alucardbsm
RS Status: P2P
One word to all AMD fanboys. No. I'm impartial and have to go with Intel here. Mostly becuase they are the new OC masters. They make a 2.66GHz CPU that can OC to 4.1GHz (stable) for $130. AMD lost the crown.

_________________
Image
My gf broke up with me for a 10th grader. I hate her.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear
PostPosted: May 16th, 2006, 8:29 pm 
Steel Member

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 1:47am
Posts: 9047
Location: In your web browserz


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 17th, 2006, 7:04 am 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: April 18th, 2005, 12:26 pm
Posts: 3479
RS Status: Classic
Alucardbsm wrote:
One word to all AMD fanboys. No. I'm impartial and have to go with Intel here. Mostly becuase they are the new OC masters. They make a 2.66GHz CPU that can OC to 4.1GHz (stable) for $130. AMD lost the crown.



"Intel Pentium D 805 Smithfield 533MHz FSB 2 x 1MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Dual Core,EM64T Processor - Retail"

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819116001

check out the info on newegg, its only good if you overclock it, however its original operating frequency is 2.66ghz yet single core amd 3000+ is around the same as a 3ghz intel ;)


roffles at the 533mhz fsb. Single core amd processors FSB ive seen go up to 1800mhzfsb.

amd still wins.. however, for that price, its not bad.. I would still go with an amd anyday over intel.

_________________
Image

"Music is the harmonization of opposites; the conciliation of warring elements."

Click here for awesome music by DJ River, downloads are free.
Check out my guide i made.
http://www.myspace.com/krazzicookiemonsta


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: May 17th, 2006, 9:56 am 
Site Owner
Offline

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 9:26 am
Posts: 7006
Location: Wild Rose Country ca
RS Name: shane12088
RS Status: P2P
The numbering system that AMD has is what used to be roughly equivilent to an Intel cpu. Not too long ago intel changed over to a more elaborate numbering system which no one knew what it meant. That meant that an AMD 2400+ was equivilent to an old Pentium 4 Northwood chip(My old one).

Just because the AMD chips have a lower clock speed does not mean they are not as good. They just can do more at that clock speed and still be the same as an intel one. If you'll remember on last week's RSBANDBUpdate! we talked about new chips that were coming out from Intel. These chips no longer use the old numbering system.

However there was a problem with the Prescott's which were what was used in making the old extreme edition, they had many heat problems.

Now with Intel's Core 2 Extreme and Core 2 Duo out soon, AMD still holds an advantage as their dual cores are more affordable. Some benchmarks have suggested that intel dual cores perform better at office tasks while AMD dual cores don't perform as well but are still good for office and gaming related tasks.

There is no question AMD is better for gaming. I have a X2 3800+ in this system and it is great. Even though it only clocks at 2.0Ghz. (I got it up to 2.2Ghz without problems 8) )

In the end there are still relatively equivlent.

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: