net neutrality

trekkie · **Posted:** September 24th, 2011, 12:44 am

Quote:

After 10 months on the shelf, the Federal Communications Commission's rules on net neutrality were finally published today in the Federal Register.

As written, the rules do three broad things for customers:

- Add transparency to how broadband providers--both wired and wireless--manage networks

- Prohibit wired broadband providers from blocking lawful content, applications, services, and non-harmful devices. Wireless providers are also barred from blocking lawful websites or applications that compete with voice or video services.

- Forbid wired broadband providers from discriminating in the transmission of lawful network traffic.

However, just because the rules have been published doesn't necessarily mean they'll take effect on November 20, as they're supposed to. This is because we expect both wired and wireless providers to challenge these rules in the courts--the way Verizon and MetroPCS challenged them back in January. The Verizon and MetroPCS cases were tossed, but only because the rules hadn't been finalized.

Approval of the rules in December 2010 was strictly along party lines. Three Democrats voted yes for the rules; two Republicans voted no. Since that time, one of the Republicans has accepted a job at Comcast.

Comcast actually spurred the FCC into action after it throttled BitTorrent traffic on its network. The FCC tried to penalize Comcast for this move, but a court ruled against the agency--since the FCC had no rules on net neutrality, it couldn't penalize Comcast for violating anything.

"The rules developed by the FCC take important steps to ensure that the Internet remains an open marketplace," Parul P. Desai, policy counsel for the Consumers Union, said in a statement.

"When purchasing Internet service, consumers rightfully expect that they will have equal access to all that the Web offers and shouldn't be held back because of industry tactics," Desai added. "For the first time, there will be clear rules to protect consumers and keep the Internet growing as an open, innovative environment."

http://www.pcworld.com/article/240505/f ... les.html#tk.rss_news

now that comcast bought NBC, makes me wonder what they may do next

Adbot · **Posted:** September 24th, 2011, 12:44 am

Duke Juker · RSBandB Donor since 07/01/2010

This doesn't seem that big a deal. Seems like the rules just follow what people were already doing. Or did I miss something?

trekkie · **Posted:** September 24th, 2011, 11:02 am

don't wanna be china

Shane · **Posted:** September 24th, 2011, 11:41 pm

I can't believe such a thing is actually going to come into effect. It's good that packets are going to be being treated equally with this legislation. If an ISP has an issue with an online service like Skype or Hulu they should be forced to compete like everyone else rather than just blocking the competitors. As the article says whether or not it'll happen on 20 November is a different story. It's a good start nonetheless.

The only issue I have with such net neutrality laws is that it's not a global solution. My packet originates in Canada and may pass through a router in the US or another country. What happens to my packet then? What if it goes through a country without such provisions.

I'm surprised that the rules are actually sane at all. The majority of law makers both south and north of the 49th parallel are pretty ignorant when it comes to technology.