Ranging

Jason · **Posted:** October 19th, 2008, 4:01 pm

I have heard that range hits more often then melee. Example: Rune scimmy vs. Maple bow w/ addy arrows. I'm f2p so I am refering to that example. What would kill faster in most situations?

Adbot · **Posted:** October 19th, 2008, 4:01 pm

Marking22 · **Posted:** October 19th, 2008, 4:02 pm

range usally kills faster than anything cause i think range hits faster than anything

Sunset Fish · **Posted:** October 19th, 2008, 5:21 pm

you can use maple bows on f2p?
anyway well it depends if your using addy then rangeing

crwire · **Posted:** October 19th, 2008, 6:46 pm

Yes ranging hits faster and yes you can use a maple bow on f2p ^^

If you talk about the extreme aka pures, then rangers will win since they can have insanely high range levels for their combat, with better d'hide armour for protection. Compared to a melee pure that can only wear iron :roll:

Theres also the fact that you can attack from afar, factor in snare/entangle and you can pretty much own any meleer :mrgreen:

Also I found that ranger pures own me when I was in full rune =.="

Xbladez · **Posted:** October 24th, 2008, 5:39 pm

yea range has the speed but lacks power on f2p. combo'd with magic like most of the f2p "pures" do and it's decent even vs meleers.

TomatoHead · **Posted:** October 25th, 2008, 10:04 am

I've lost full rune to a lvl 85 ranging pure.

Adbot · **Posted:** October 25th, 2008, 10:04 am

Chi Meng · **Posted:** October 25th, 2008, 7:43 pm

Yes It does hit more.. but only if your 70+ range..