Swordfish

Ranging God · **Posted:** February 10th, 2007, 10:57 pm

How much do they sell for raw, and how much cooked???

Adbot · **Posted:** February 10th, 2007, 10:57 pm

Tidus · **Posted:** February 10th, 2007, 11:34 pm

I think they both sell for 400 each or something in F2P, but the problem is that almost nobody sell or buy them... lobs are a lot less problem to buy/sell if you're planning to get cooking exp from that :p

And still, lobs are 120k xp an hour, it's pretty good

Alex · **Posted:** February 11th, 2007, 6:04 am

Yeah, when you're fishing lobsters, you only fish lobsters.

If you fish swordfish, you fish tuna as well.

Christopher · **Posted:** February 11th, 2007, 8:16 am

Ya, I'd recommend you go lobs...plus you will probably burn less lobs...compared to swords.

Ranging God · **Posted:** February 11th, 2007, 9:19 am

meesekiller wrote:

Ya, I'd recommend you go lobs...plus you will probably burn less lobs...compared to swords.

Well i wasent going to cook unit I was lvl 81 with cooking gloves = P
Plus for some odd reason I like Swardfish lol

Christopher · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 1:11 am

Ranging God wrote:

meesekiller wrote:

Ya, I'd recommend you go lobs...plus you will probably burn less lobs...compared to swords.

Well i wasent going to cook unit I was lvl 81 with cooking gloves = P
Plus for some odd reason I like Swardfish lol

Must have been the movie...

Adbot · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 1:11 am

Ranging God · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 10:00 am

meesekiller wrote:

Ranging God wrote:

meesekiller wrote:

Ya, I'd recommend you go lobs...plus you will probably burn less lobs...compared to swords.

Well i wasent going to cook unit I was lvl 81 with cooking gloves = P
Plus for some odd reason I like Swardfish lol

Must have been the movie...

lol, no but that movies kicked(u know what o.O)

xOhYax · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 1:57 pm

But lobbies would be faster xp

Tidus · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 3:31 pm

xOhYax wrote:

But lobbies would be faster xp

I agree with this point. Because they're a pain to buy and sell, compared to lobsters which are easy.

Steven · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 3:37 pm

A lot of people but lobsters, instead of swordfish.

My vote would be the lobsters are better.

Ranging God · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 4:02 pm

OK, lobbies tell 94 I guess then

Tidus · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 4:17 pm

Well you can do lobs until 90 because you won't burn a lot of sharks at 90.

Ranging God · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 6:58 pm

Sephiroth-DrX wrote:

Well you can do lobs until 90 because you won't burn a lot of sharks at 90.

yeah that is what my little bro and friend told me. Thanks, guess I will start at 90 = P

Tidus · **Posted:** February 12th, 2007, 8:37 pm

Ranging God wrote:

Sephiroth-DrX wrote:

Well you can do lobs until 90 because you won't burn a lot of sharks at 90.

yeah that is what my little bro and friend told me. Thanks, guess I will start at 90 = P

Yes, because i started sharks at 94 and regretted it

James · **Posted:** February 13th, 2007, 8:43 am

for raw i think 300ea