So Ive recently put some thought into have my own weekly topic. So each week ill post what i think is a major news story, or something that i can see two sides on. The topic will be open for debate but please keep it clean, we can all have different opinions. So how this will work is all post the topic and then make my statement, at this point you can either disagree or agree. Please include why you disagree or agree.
Topic- Nadya Suleman has 16 kids total with the help of vitro fertilization. Is it wrong, or is it her choice.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/31/nadya-suleman-octuplets-m_n_162756.html-The news story reported by Huffington Post
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090127/ap_on_re_us/calif_octuplets-The story as covered by yahoo news
Picture of Ms. Sulemen pregnantThe first thing that comes to my mind is how in the hell did a lady who lives of welfare afford vitro fertilization which cost over $100,000, abuse of the welfare system? She has also been credited to have thousands of dollars in plastic surgery. So to start this massive family off she has 6 kids starting seven years ago, which her mom is quoted as saying "she cant take care of the six now." So then she pays a doctor $100,000 to implant 8 more eggs to make a whopping 16 kid family. SHE HAS NO JOB, how does she plan to support these kids, welfare? She has been asking $1,000,000 to do a simple interview. Im my opinion she is using there babies for profit to make her life glitz and glamor. What she has done is wrong, her kids need to be taken into protective custody and the doctor needs to be disbarred. With no job she couldn't support 6 kids so there is no way she could support 16 kids. Ms. Sulemen is totally wrong is what she has done, she has brought 8 more kids into this world with no way to support them expect pimp them out to news and magazine corporations.
I look froward to hearing what you have to say about this issue....
Kyle