USA or Russian federation

Gontcha · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 4:54 am

god luva wrote:

PS: i noticed that that u said "pwns" and "pwnd", is that just a typo or a new craze happening

2nd option
on toppic, vodka tastes good...so they don't wanna spill it on americans :roll:

, and molotov is made out of gasoline and battery acid+chlor.

Adbot · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 4:54 am

Movie_Star15 · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 4:56 am

I know, but the alcohol amount burns too. Im takin StReEt BOI!

- Tom - · 25/11/2006

USA would win cuz UK are allies and UK p00n k?

but from the facts i would imagine usa winning cuz they have more allies (i think) and they DO have nukes an more chemical and biochemical weapons...

Athelus · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 10:35 am

the gurkhas rock full stop

Rocket2004 · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 1:01 pm

Goookl wrote:

USA would win cuz UK are allies and UK p00n k?

but from the facts i would imagine usa winning cuz they have more allies (i think) and they DO have nukes an more chemical and biochemical weapons...

The allies won't do much

If russia holds off USA and at the meantime crushing it.. the allies dies itself

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 1:43 pm

For the 5th time!

Russia gets europe. England is europe. We wouldn't ditch europe for the u.s no matter how close we are specialy now we have seen the type of support we get when we get attacked by terrorists. Trust has all but gone there as soon as tony is out there will be biggg changes me thinks.

Adbot · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 1:43 pm

Athelus · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 3:37 pm

creepybacon wrote:

For the 5th time!

Russia gets europe. England is europe.

the rest was true but..... france and germany are just a tiny little bit more influential there... don't underestimate their armies though, a franco-german force would be a serious contender to america!

King Kulla · **Posted:** July 17th, 2005, 5:19 pm

Movie_Star15 wrote:

The Russians will throw moltavs at the americans with all the $&@# vodka they have! Thats my reason. ^^

Apparently your aim gets bad when you swig too much...they might hit me instead... :roll:

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 12:11 am

Quote:

creepybacon wrote:
For the 5th time!

Russia gets europe. England is europe.

the rest was true but..... france and germany are just a tiny little bit more influential there... don't underestimate their armies though, a franco-german force would be a serious contender to america!

Naw. As i have no idea what the armys are like nowadays i just look back in history..we beat them before..why not again?

Athelus · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 12:46 am

(because france on its own has twice as many nukes, superior ships a larger and better equipped army and together their airforce would be the best in he world- don't base things on history!)

Movie_Star15 · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 2:53 am

I asked my Mom (shes a Senior Parts Analyst for Pratt and Whittney [airplane company]) and she said that most likely, America would win due to that we have some of the best electronic warfare on the planet. She said that compared to Russia we are lightyears ahead due to them having serious econmical problems (I.E.- They cant get much cash flow)!

Not being hating towards nething, but she helps Pratt build F-22s (which are the best tacitical warfare fighter jets out there due to them being able to bomb and dog-fight) and F-16s, which helped me disprove the MIG theory since MIGs are technically only fighter aircraft! Yes they can go into space... Whoopie. My money is still that drunken old Bush (God bless him) and America would win. Regardless of allies.

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 12:59 pm

Quote:

(because france on its own has twice as many nukes, superior ships a larger and better equipped army and together their airforce would be the best in he world- don't base things on history!)

Proof pl0z. I've never known a country to just give away how many nukes they have..nor do they leave them lying around for enemy satelites to pick up. I VERY much doubt there ships are superior as for size..plff..just means there easyer to hit. There definitly not better equipped or at least not by any sort of big gap. Also considering france hasn't been to war in..how long? How can you claim there airforce is the best in the world? Again i very much doubt it.

Athelus · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 1:19 pm

if you read it ays a "combined german and french" airforce would be best- think 2 medium size well trained= one giant size well trained- and france went to war in the cote d'ivoire, recently when the goverment backed airforce killed some of their peace-keeping troops rebelled- the countrys airforce was completeley wiped out...

czskrazzi · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 4:36 pm

United States in fact has the best naval force, with i believe 12-15 carriers now, and a new super carrier being built with "emp weapons" "emp shields of some type, reducing damage by torpedoes" + tons more.. The U.S. has at least 12 more carriers than any other country. Carriers are the ones that hold marines, navy seals, and also army, helicoptes, most types of bombers and fighter jets.

If i had the article that shows a diagram, and other info i would post it.. but its in a WIRED magazine i have.

Movie_Star15 · **Posted:** July 18th, 2005, 8:28 pm

Yeah, I think WWII proved that we had one of the best naval forces... I mean if they could wipe out 3/4ths of it and we can STILL hold the Pacific, then we have the right to brag... ^^. Carriers are the bomb. Like floating fortresses.