combat calculator is a bit off

xxteargodxx · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 12:59 am

I am as listed below & your calc says I'm 110 combat though I'm only 109 just thought you should know.

86 att
86 str
94 def
90 hits
81 magic
65 prayer
80 range
109 combat

Adbot · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 12:59 am

Chi Meng · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 7:20 am

There is a combat " - " and a combat " + " thing on the page where you edit your sig. Just click the " - " sign and re-do your sig.

Kingphatguy2 · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 1:55 pm

i noticed this too when i used your calculators before, i was trying to figure out what lvls i would need for 100 combat.. its like 1 lvl off

xxteargodxx · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 3:53 pm

chimeng wrote:

There is a combat " - " and a combat " + " thing on the page where you edit your sig. Just click the " - " sign and re-do your sig.

well thanks for letting me know I could get a sig but thats not what I was talking about I was talking about the calculator itself being off.

Shane · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 4:13 pm

The reason there are a few small errors is because Runescape does not show decimals in the combat value. Therefore we can't necessarily retrive a 100% accurate formula. Although we believe it is pretty acurate.

Sturm · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 6:18 pm

Shane wrote:

The reason there are a few small errors is because Runescape does not show decimals in the combat value. Therefore we can't necessarily retrive a 100% accurate formula. Although we believe it is pretty acurate.

true... and another factor in the slight error is that the formula of jagex might involve fractions, not decimal places, hence the difference-of-one-combat-level the calculator shows...

i myself, according to the calculator, should be level 96 now, but my actual is just 95...

but i'm not complaining... the calculators here are the best and most updated that i found...

Adbot · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 6:18 pm

Mike · **Posted:** February 3rd, 2005, 9:06 pm

Well thanks, we are still collecting data to try and make a more accurate formula