Which weapon is better?

King Kulla · **Posted:** February 6th, 2005, 12:00 am

it depends on what u like. I like speed so i use a scimmy most of the time, but i got a rune baxe and it hits well, even with training def. R2h is really slow, and also brings down ur defense against ranging. I doubt if they are going to bring in d2hs at all, they would hit hard but take a minute between hittings rofl

Adbot · **Posted:** February 6th, 2005, 12:00 am

calcium878 · **Posted:** February 6th, 2005, 3:28 am

stanley1943 wrote:

Rocket2004 wrote:

Dagger, rune long and halberts are the weapons you should think about.

what does longsword special at?wondering

u mean max?

sith lord76 · **Posted:** February 6th, 2005, 4:09 am

scimmy is way way way beta! r2h is slow and more power ful, but ull hit less often. scimmy is fast, acurate and fairly powerful, the best wepon all round. ad u can wear a shield with a scimmy

alexpc007 · **Posted:** February 12th, 2005, 4:37 am

r2h ISNT good cos:
when you wear it you cant wear a shield
Its slow
If your atk lvl is low, you hit pretty often 0, and it takes a lot to kill an easy enemy.
Rune battle is better than a r2h, but worse than a scim

calcium878 · **Posted:** February 12th, 2005, 5:22 am

r2h is also VERY UGLY, and the way it attacks is just awful!

Brad · **Posted:** February 12th, 2005, 5:23 pm

yea the rune 2h is a pretty rubish weapon, but i dont think it matters if a weapon is ugly or not just if u can hit well with it

Adbot · **Posted:** February 12th, 2005, 5:23 pm

draconum_ggg · **Posted:** February 16th, 2005, 11:32 pm

Dragon weapons are better than any rune weapon. (period).
I only own 2 rune weapons (pick-axe and halberd ... because they are the best I can get, but the halberd is way too slow)