SHOOT 2 KILL POLICY london terrorims yes or no?

eiil skeillz · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 1:53 pm

i say big yes terrorists shot on target in london if u dont stop to police u get shot end of :shock:

Adbot · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 1:53 pm

Restless Soul · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 2:14 pm

This is a delicate subject to talk about but my opinion is this; Police shouldn't take the risk of allowing a terrorist suspect into a place where they might kill innocent people, they must stop that suspect at all costs.

It may seem harsh but one life dies instead of hundreds.

Brad · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 4:49 pm

I think if they are sure that the person that they are about to shoot, does have bombs and is going to kill other people yes.. but they must be sure of these things, not just spot a random person acting strange and decide to shoot them

attack432 · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 5:00 pm

Restless Soul wrote:

This is a delicate subject to talk about but my opinion is this; Police shouldn't take the risk of allowing a terrorist suspect into a place where they might kill innocent people, they must stop that suspect at all costs.

It may seem harsh but one life dies instead of hundreds.

I was JUST about to say something pretty darn close to that but i decided to read the second post, you read my mind :shock:

The Scythe · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 9:52 pm

Shoot! Shoot! Shoot!

Dave · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 11:34 pm

Brad wrote:

I think if they are sure that the person that they are about to shoot, does have bombs and is going to kill other people yes.. but they must be sure of these things, not just spot a random person acting strange and decide to shoot them

Exactly what I was thinking. You can give the poliece the ability to do that but they need to be 100% sure about it. Not 99% but 100% becuase they might shoot an innocent person.

Adbot · **Posted:** September 3rd, 2005, 11:34 pm

Crysala · **Posted:** September 4th, 2005, 12:07 am

its a tough question to ask that you know..you can neither say yes or no because theres always human error that comes into play. the shooter could miss and hit someone else, get their info wrong, or cause a massacre or strike. its too tough to call but im floating towards yes as long as 100% of error is eliminated.

CreepyPirate · **Posted:** September 4th, 2005, 10:36 am

Yes. Don't even NEED to think about it. We have already shot one man who was no terrorist. It was a mistake. I still stand by there decision the guy was suspected and going into the undergrounds. You don't have time to be 100 percent sure he is one. You have a few seconds to decide. One inoccent dead man is better than a thousand inoccent ones dead because of them.

Of course if are goverment wasn't so pathetic and let every single illegal in here, give them a house AND a job we probably wouldn't have to resort to these things. But no it's far to hard to grab them as they sneak in on a lorry and send them right back isn't it?

Edit: And while im here ANY of those scum that like to sit in are country and preech about how evil we are and BURN are flags on are OWN streets can be shot. My girlfriends mother teachers an illegal blind boy when london got bombed he was telling her how proud he was and saying good they deserve it. I have no idea how she kept her cool because i would of kicked the living hell out of him there and then. Blind or not. They need to be booted no questions asked.