Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 1 Defence, why?
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:37 pm 
Chat Moderator
Offline

Joined: December 15th, 2006, 4:43 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: G.A., USA us
RS Name: Firemana
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Problem Solvers
I'm just wondering what the point of having 1 defence on a pure is? if you want low cb don't do attack because attack raises it quicker then defence. Would someone(s) mind explaining to me why pures / hybrids do this?

_________________
.:: The Legend of The Sword :: FaceBook : Google+ : Twitter ::.
Image
::
88th Dragon Member : Informer Writer : Content Crew : Chat Moderator ::
"If it ain't broke, dun fix it."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:37 pm 
Chat Moderator

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 1:47am
Posts: 9047
Location: In your web browserz


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:39 pm 
Rsbandb Donor
Offline

Joined: January 28th, 2006, 12:22 pm
Posts: 4453
Location: ONTARIbrO ca
RS Name: Skype Jay
RS Status: F2P
Because they like to eat and hit high damage. They want attack so they can kill the opponent very fast before they get attacked and start getting ripped apart.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:44 pm 
Chat Moderator
Offline

Joined: December 15th, 2006, 4:43 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: G.A., USA us
RS Name: Firemana
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Problem Solvers
So pures like spending money and then teleing out when they find out their opponent has higher defence then their attack?

I can understand why they want high str.

_________________
.:: The Legend of The Sword :: FaceBook : Google+ : Twitter ::.
Image
::
88th Dragon Member : Informer Writer : Content Crew : Chat Moderator ::
"If it ain't broke, dun fix it."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:47 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: September 9th, 2005, 1:16 pm
Posts: 2253 us
RS Status: Classic
The point of pures is able to deal maximum damage while managing to keep the lowest possible combat level. Since defence doesn't help to add any kind of damage they all keep at 1 to keep their levels low.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 5:51 pm 
Chat Moderator
Offline

Joined: December 15th, 2006, 4:43 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: G.A., USA us
RS Name: Firemana
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Problem Solvers
ok, maximum damage and low cb.

But that brings up another subject.

Why do they want low cb? Only high lvls have good items, do the pures try to take advantage of lvl 40 wildy+?

_________________
.:: The Legend of The Sword :: FaceBook : Google+ : Twitter ::.
Image
::
88th Dragon Member : Informer Writer : Content Crew : Chat Moderator ::
"If it ain't broke, dun fix it."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 6:34 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: September 12th, 2005, 5:51 pm
Posts: 2527
Location: which coordinates we usin? ua
RS Name: Tbl
RS Status: Old School (2007)
If they DO take it far enough they will get higher combat..

but usually if they keep low combat it's just for the fun of pking, I guess, I don't know..I don't like PKing :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 6:34 pm 
Dragon Member

Joined: September 9th, 2004, 1:47am
Posts: 9047
Location: In your web browserz


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 7:41 pm 
Dragon Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: September 9th, 2005, 1:16 pm
Posts: 2253 us
RS Status: Classic
Jasonmrc wrote:
ok, maximum damage and low cb.

But that brings up another subject.

Why do they want low cb? Only high lvls have good items, do the pures try to take advantage of lvl 40 wildy+?


Pures stake or PK at low level wildy, if they going to fight a normal character (with equal stats, like defence/attack/etc..) they going to be much move overpowered which is going to make them an automatic winner. I hope that explained your question. Being the lowest possible common level=owning anybody who is same level as you are (maybe even a little bit higher, which makes it ideal for PKing).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 7:48 pm 
Chat Moderator
Offline

Joined: December 15th, 2006, 4:43 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: G.A., USA us
RS Name: Firemana
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Problem Solvers
It answers some. One more (atleast) still remains, whats the point of pking a lvl 50? They rarely have anything worth getting.

They're pretty much bullys (or should i say concentrated) against normal players of their lvl.

_________________
.:: The Legend of The Sword :: FaceBook : Google+ : Twitter ::.
Image
::
88th Dragon Member : Informer Writer : Content Crew : Chat Moderator ::
"If it ain't broke, dun fix it."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 11:10 pm 
Dragon Member
Offline

Joined: May 27th, 2006, 6:26 am
Posts: 2159
Location: Photoshop england
RS Name: Humus_75
RS Status: Classic
Clan Name: Instinct
Well, about 50% of the time people make pures so they can have fun, pking is the only thing in runescape where you dont just click...click...click ... pking a lvl 50 in members could get you full black dragon hide, rune arrows, mage short, archer helm or maybe even a robin hood hat. In f2p you could pk full rune... and thats quite alot if your a meleer, it pays for the stuff you lose when you die.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 21st, 2007, 11:42 pm 
Rsbandb Donor
Offline

Joined: October 18th, 2005, 9:32 am
Posts: 1041
RS Status: Classic
Humus wrote:
Well, about 50% of the time people make pures so they can have fun, pking is the only thing in runescape where you dont just click...click...click ... pking a lvl 50 in members could get you full black dragon hide, rune arrows, mage short, archer helm or maybe even a robin hood hat. In f2p you could pk full rune... and thats quite alot if your a meleer, it pays for the stuff you lose when you die.


I think pures and hybrids are all about making money. For example, if you have full iron...how much money do you lose if you die? Not much. But if you pk someone using full rune how much do you gain? Quite a lot. This concept applies across the board...and winning as a pure mostly means you hit your high hits.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 22nd, 2007, 12:02 am 
Rsbandb Donor
User avatar
Offline

Joined: September 14th, 2005, 3:25 pm
Posts: 1160
Location: Alaska
RS Name: 9073461425
RS Status: P2P
Well, pures were first made for the sole purpose of killing normal players that wander into the wild. They keep they're defence at 1 so that they appear weaker because their combat is lower. Hence the normal player gets killed because they lack the combat skills that the pure had.

Pures nowadays are getting kindof useless now, since generally you only end up in a pure vs. pure. It's really only for some profit now and amusement.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 22nd, 2007, 2:44 am 
BANNED
User avatar
Offline

Joined: April 1st, 2005, 12:09 am
Posts: 2188 sg
RS Name: Badass San
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Ex-Rune Raiders
Jasonmrc wrote:
whats the point of pking a lvl 50? They rarely have anything worth getting.


My 1 def pure has 70 strength and he's level 61. And that's not even considered a half-decent pure.

To start "owning" you have to have at least 80+ strength. By then you're at 65-70.

At that point of levels, people start wearing rune and dragon, so it's still worthwhile to pk, without facing trouble from them hitting high, as higher-leveled people hit more constantly and harder, especially on a 1 def pure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 22nd, 2007, 6:40 am 
Rsbandb Donor
User avatar
Offline

Joined: September 25th, 2005, 7:00 pm
Posts: 1582
Location: Duel Arena
RS Name: A I C S
RS Status: P2P
even at low levels (50-60 cb) people have glorys, runes, rune arrows, karils xbows. etc.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 22nd, 2007, 9:48 am 
Iron Member
Offline

Joined: March 6th, 2007, 5:43 pm
Posts: 26
Location: Colorado
RS Name: Domathere
RS Status: P2P
Clan Name: Death Dragons
the true point to pures was and is lost with classic.

for those that have been around long enough to remember the 3 hit rule, thats where pures came from. the concept is the same in RS2 but theres no "trap" in new as there was in old.

classic u engaged in combat in wild and had 3 cmb turns before either player could run, this made a str pure deadly, 3 hits didnt give u enough time to eat and attack back before you were dead when u ran agianst a str or range pure.

in RS2 with no lockdown to cmb, yes, pures like wasteing money and talkin smack. love watchin all these pures at edgevill running back and forth, pjing, telle'in and just being rude. its annoying and if theres going to be pures, at least make it so they are worth something.

_________________
Image
Founder and Leader of Death Dragons


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 22nd, 2007, 12:30 pm 
Dragon Member
Offline

Joined: June 12th, 2006, 9:45 am
Posts: 1058 sn
RS Status: Classic
Defence can't do anything against a pure nowadays.

I mean look at these stats:
60 attack
70+ strenght
31 prayer
82+ mage
70 range

vs

60 attack
50-60 strenght
43+ prayer
def 40
mage 30-50
range 50+

its obvious who is going to win.
The pure.
Why?
The normal guy will definately wear somekind of armor(rune,etc.) the pure will barrage him, if he takes of the armor he will dds spec him.
Normal accounts dont have any chance against pures with 1 def.

_________________
Anubis wrote:
I'd just like to say one thing, because it irritates the **** out of me. I'm sick and tired of you people deciding what's best for everyone else without asking or discussing it first. The sandbox was very rarely used by moderators, site owners and admins, it was used by the regular member to have "fun". Flame baiting, spamming or whatever, I think it would have been only fair to ask what everyone else thought first. Regardless of the outcome, it would have been a lot less selfish (because removing it like this is) and would have gotten a much better response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: