| Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/ |
|
| star trek online https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=70131 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | trekkie [ August 10th, 2008, 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | star trek online |
you'll like this shane. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/38185.html it is long so unless you're shane just skip to about 11 minutes to start hearing some of the points of the game game trailer http://www.gametrailers.com/player/38184.html |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ August 10th, 2008, 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | power crazy [ August 14th, 2008, 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
I watch the show sometimes. but that game look like a 3/5. Star Trek shouldnt make games. Power CRAZY! |
|
| Author: | Shane [ August 15th, 2008, 4:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
power crazy wrote: I watch the show sometimes. but that game look like a 3/5. Star Trek shouldnt make games. Power CRAZY! Have you played any star trek games in the past? About 6-8 years ago Activision had the license to make trek games, they were the best publisher for them including many hits including Armada I/II, and the Star Fleet Command series. I know there are some of us who will be getting it. It looks like it'll be a good game. It's the type of Star Trek game I've always wanted, bridge based strategy, ship-to-ship combat, and land based combat. Throw in exploration and it's very star treky. The graphics also look good. For anyone who watched the whole 45 minute presentation there was a question about hardware requirements. Basically the lead dev had said that they are going to be aiming to get this to work on the most amount of machines possible, just like WoW does. |
|
| Author: | Humus [ August 15th, 2008, 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Shane wrote: Basically the lead dev had said that they are going to be aiming to get this to work on the most amount of machines possible, just like WoW does. Pfft, I would have to buy another computer to play WoW... I mean, my computer cost around £700-£800 and it is pretty decent. Graphics card, Sound card. Can't play CS:S either which sucks because whenever you host events its on Source. 
|
|
| Author: | Mushroom Queen [ August 15th, 2008, 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
YES. No if's and's or but's. I really love Star Trek and I think it'd be a great MMO. |
|
| Author: | Total Plox [ August 15th, 2008, 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Meh... I think Star Trek would make a decent FPS, but I think devs have already failed at that. |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ August 15th, 2008, 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Anubis [ August 15th, 2008, 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
It'd make a good game, if done right. However I don't think i'd ever see myself playing it for the pure reason it's Star Trek. And I'm above star trek. |
|
| Author: | Sev [ August 15th, 2008, 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Humus wrote: Shane wrote: Basically the lead dev had said that they are going to be aiming to get this to work on the most amount of machines possible, just like WoW does. Pfft, I would have to buy another computer to play WoW... I mean, my computer cost around £700-£800 and it is pretty decent. Graphics card, Sound card. Can't play CS:S either which sucks because whenever you host events its on Source. I have a $300 computer bought 2 1/2 years ago and it works fine for WoW
|
|
| Author: | Brad [ August 16th, 2008, 5:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Humus wrote: Shane wrote: Basically the lead dev had said that they are going to be aiming to get this to work on the most amount of machines possible, just like WoW does. Pfft, I would have to buy another computer to play WoW... I mean, my computer cost around £700-£800 and it is pretty decent. Graphics card, Sound card. Can't play CS:S either which sucks because whenever you host events its on Source. WoW doesn't have high spec requirements so you must have over payed by a lot. My PC cost £350 two years ago and I just bought a £60 radeon graphics card wow works fine on it. |
|
| Author: | Humus [ August 16th, 2008, 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Wow, thats okay then.  My bad.I would buy WoW but it just costs too much monthly.. isn't it around £10? |
|
| Author: | Brad [ August 16th, 2008, 2:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Humus wrote: Wow, thats okay then. My bad.I would buy WoW but it just costs too much monthly.. isn't it around £10? Yeah, £8.99 a month. Slightly less if you pay for more than one month at a time. |
|
| Author: | trekkie [ August 18th, 2008, 9:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
Total Plox wrote: Meh... I think Star Trek would make a decent FPS, but I think devs have already failed at that. they did that, the game wasn't too bad but it's nothing mind blowing. you basically can use weapons from the show but it wasn't terrible. just after you played it once or twice you're just going through the motions |
|
| Author: | EMS9889 [ August 19th, 2008, 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: star trek online |
This Is A TRAGEDY  Star Trek Will Soon Be Taking Over The World With MERCHANDISING And Collectable PEZ DISPENSERS The World IS Coming To An END!I hope the game is 30$ a week so no one will play it lol! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|