1. SOTW 80
Coolbrow and Magicjarvis
2. SOTW 81
Samuel
3. SOTW 82
Samuel
4. SOTW 83
Neo 9001
5. SOTW 84
Slimppu
| Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/ |
|
| SOTM #7 - January (Vote Here) https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=77&t=45004 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Shane [ January 29th, 2007, 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | SOTM #7 - January (Vote Here) |
1. SOTW 80
Coolbrow and Magicjarvis 2. SOTW 81
Samuel 3. SOTW 82
Samuel 4. SOTW 83
Neo 9001 5. SOTW 84
Slimppu |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ January 29th, 2007, 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Kyle [ January 29th, 2007, 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I voted for week 83. |
|
| Author: | Andy [ January 29th, 2007, 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
SOTW 82 - because it's unique, and it's green |
|
| Author: | Warren [ January 29th, 2007, 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Andy wrote: SOTW 82 - because it's unique, and it's green
Same with me, and it looks great to my eye. 
|
|
| Author: | Steven [ January 29th, 2007, 8:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
SOTW 82, because it looks very good. It caught my eye first. |
|
| Author: | Magicjarvis [ January 29th, 2007, 8:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
meh only reason i dont like 82 is that its so close to the tut. so its not that original. |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ January 29th, 2007, 8:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Jasonmrc [ January 29th, 2007, 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
81, Looks Great, Samuel did a good job. |
|
| Author: | Chief Snake [ January 29th, 2007, 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Week 84. 82 was rather unoriginal. 
|
|
| Author: | Jaden [ January 29th, 2007, 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Slimppu's I voted for. Looks outstanding. |
|
| Author: | The Killer [ January 30th, 2007, 12:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
82 stood out from the rest. Got my vote. |
|
| Author: | Samuel [ January 30th, 2007, 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It's close so far, Me, Slimppu or urm... me? |
|
| Author: | Hairy Munky [ January 30th, 2007, 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Slimppu's is my favourite. |
|
| Author: | Slimppu [ January 30th, 2007, 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hairy munky wrote: Slimppu's is my favourite.
gee, thanks ;D EDIT: ergh, i just noticed that Samuel's sig is 167 pixels tall. isn't that too big? |
|
| Author: | Samuel [ January 30th, 2007, 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Slimppu wrote: ergh, i just noticed that Samuel's sig is 167 pixels tall. isn't that too big?
It's what!? Uh-oh... That's just transparent space, the actual sig is 150. |
|
| Author: | Chief Snake [ January 30th, 2007, 5:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Samuel wrote: Slimppu wrote: ergh, i just noticed that Samuel's sig is 167 pixels tall. isn't that too big? It's what!? Uh-oh... That's just transparent space, the actual sig is 150. Oh wow, that's appalling on our part. Other sigs with transparent bits like that have been disqualified before. Well, too late now. XD |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|