| Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/ |
|
| SOTW: Week 201 Voting https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=74270 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | wildy277 [ April 19th, 2009, 9:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: SOTW: Week 201 Voting |
Ehh...isn't the first one too big? |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ April 19th, 2009, 9:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Warren [ April 19th, 2009, 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: SOTW: Week 201 Voting |
Total Plox wrote: Quote: Signatures which are "effortless in design" or have been entered "jokingly" will be disqualified. i would consider taking a picture of your hand with a webcam and putting a comic style filter over it to be effortless, so that one is out of the question. Assuming I put no effort in to it is like assuming Anubis put no effort into his sig that won recently. Just because I spent minimal time in photoshop doesn't mean I didn't spend time on arranging the objects irl and creating the full background story and my own characters. I also put so much effort that I forgot about the other character, Toronto Maple Mole, as he was well hidden by the Blue Lampern's invisibility powers because they are SUPER HEROES, a theme common among comics. I also wouldn't encorporate the "@#$%ING", something also common in comics if I did not use any effort. Or the comic style bubble thing. wildy wrote: Ehh...isn't the first one too big? y u acuse w/o proof |
|
| Author: | KefkaticFanatic [ April 19th, 2009, 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: SOTW: Week 201 Voting |
#2 because the statement in #3 is incredibly awkward. |
|
| Author: | Tim [ April 19th, 2009, 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: SOTW: Week 201 Voting |
Warren's Signature looks big but I don't think that matters if it is in the voting, anyway, it is the only one that represents the theme so I voted for it. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|