Runescape Bits & Bytes
https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/

SOTW Comment Thread
https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=73320
Page 5 of 10

Author:  Steven [ July 1st, 2009, 1:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Mushroom Queen wrote:
>_>

<_<

CAN WE HAVE A TRIBUTE WEEK FOR SOTW??? Where the entries have to be in honour of MJ, Billy Mays, or Farrah Fawcett. PLEASE OH PLEASE. I promise I'll enter one.


I'd enter that, too.

Author:  Adbot [ July 1st, 2009, 1:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear


Author:  King Kulla [ July 1st, 2009, 4:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Loving the activity, it's wonderful to be able to look at so many awesome sigs! Keep it up guys! :D

Author:  Humus [ July 8th, 2009, 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Steven wrote:
Mushroom Queen wrote:
>_>

<_<

CAN WE HAVE A TRIBUTE WEEK FOR SOTW??? Where the entries have to be in honour of MJ, Billy Mays, or Farrah Fawcett. PLEASE OH PLEASE. I promise I'll enter one.


I'd enter that, too.

Yeah, sounds good to me. They had one over at PR, too. :)

Author:  Kenny [ July 8th, 2009, 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Humus wrote:
Steven wrote:
Mushroom Queen wrote:
>_>

<_<

CAN WE HAVE A TRIBUTE WEEK FOR SOTW??? Where the entries have to be in honour of MJ, Billy Mays, or Farrah Fawcett. PLEASE OH PLEASE. I promise I'll enter one.


I'd enter that, too.

Yeah, sounds good to me. They had one over at PR, too. :)

Me aswell, but I guess that'd make Cheif wanna do it less :(

Author:  Iron Maiden [ July 12th, 2009, 2:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Just take note that I gave Peacekeeper permission to use my Voldemort sig on another forum with his name on it. But I'm the true maker of the sig, just to dont make any confusion :P

I've signed my rsbandb name on it by the way :P
So there is no sig ripping in any kind :P

Author:  Mushroom Queen [ July 15th, 2009, 11:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

OUTRAGE. I AM GOING TO ENTER A MICHAEL JACKSON SIGNATURE FOR THE NEXT SOTW TO SHOW MY PROTEST OF SUCH AN UNFAIR UNFAIR UNFAIR UNFAIR DECISION. YOU'RE SO EVIL, SHANE.

I'm going to start making it now.

Author:  Adbot [ July 15th, 2009, 11:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear


Author:  Dokter Bob [ July 16th, 2009, 1:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Mushroom Queen wrote:
OUTRAGE. I AM GOING TO ENTER A MICHAEL JACKSON SIGNATURE FOR THE NEXT SOTW TO SHOW MY PROTEST OF SUCH AN UNFAIR UNFAIR UNFAIR UNFAIR DECISION. YOU'RE SO EVIL, SHANE.

I'm going to start making it now.



Yeah, maybe I can put that Billy Mays sig I made a few days ago to use :P

Author:  Slimppu [ July 17th, 2009, 8:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Cool, rule 12 doesn't apply anymore.

Author:  Dokter Bob [ July 17th, 2009, 8:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Slimppu wrote:
Cool, rule 12 doesn't apply anymore.



SOTW rules wrote:
"Aspects which may constitute disqualification are lack of detail, a lack of any background, a 'text-only' signature or poorly drawn stick figures."


I agree with Slimppu.

Author:  Al3X [ July 17th, 2009, 9:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Dokter Bob wrote:
Slimppu wrote:
Cool, rule 12 doesn't apply anymore.



SOTW rules wrote:
"Aspects which may constitute disqualification are lack of detail, a lack of any background, a 'text-only' signature or poorly drawn stick figures."


I agree with Slimppu.


If I make a sig in paint and it gets DQ'd I'm blaming you guys then :D

Wait if I make it in photoshop will it be exempt from rule 12?

Author:  Slimppu [ July 17th, 2009, 10:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Al3X wrote:
Wait if I make it in photoshop will it be exempt from rule 12?

Of course not. Or at the very least, it shouldn't. You can make perfectly effortless sigs on both programs.

Author:  Warren [ July 17th, 2009, 9:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

Wow discrimination. Because the heads are square? Besides not having a steady mouse hand (others may be aided by xbox), squary figures have been dominant in my cartoon style since grade 9. Just check my sketch book (not that I'm uploading them).

I honestly see no difference between mine and Ryans that seperates jokingly from serious. Might as well get the benefits from the style before people stop voting for it... If a large number of votes is going to go into this type of signature, there should be at least a choice as it is very different from most other sigs. If the people who want to vote for such a sig are divided among two signatures, then it leaves the real signatures to get actual higher votes.

In SOTW212, the stickfigure animation sig was 3 away from tieing the first place. That is very close, and could have very well happened. Had there been a similiar sig to divide those 16 voters, it would have not been so close to winning.

Author:  Kenny [ July 18th, 2009, 6:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

I don't get why we have to remove what humour we have left. Both those signatures had effort, albeit less than the others but it still takes knowledge to animate them. Everyday RSBANDB has another drip of fun sucked out, this being another example. I just wish sometimes people could see the fun side and not treat it as an all out war to get in the good books for reporting someone because they wanted to make a lighthearted signature.

Author:  Dokter Bob [ July 18th, 2009, 6:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

As I said, this website should be fun and light hearted, but SOTW isn't the right place to be making jokes... We've got Non RS Media, Forum Games, Runescape Related Media, Non RS Discussion, etc for that purpose...

Author:  Slimppu [ July 18th, 2009, 6:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SOTW Comment Thread

They were humorous? I must have missed that....

And as Dokter Bob said, SOTW is the place for artistic ability, not for poorly drawn stick figures attempting to make a joke.

Page 5 of 10 All times are UTC - 7 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/