2nd Sig :D (Please give me constructive criticism) Thanks.

schoolboy · **Posted:** August 12th, 2010, 3:55 pm

PLEASE, if your taking the time to look at this, please comment.

Well, here it is, my 2nd sig

I think its a bit better then the first one because its not light and dark, but just dark. It also has a border as Anubis suggested, and it doesn't have that crappy text like the last one because I suck at texts/fonts.

Please give me constructive criticism, im looking forward to all the bad comments

V1

V2

Not much of a difference, just someone suggested it... idk?

Adbot · **Posted:** August 12th, 2010, 3:55 pm

ilethaldose · **Posted:** August 12th, 2010, 8:07 pm

I really like it. Assasins creed has always been a good game. There really is nothing bad about the sig, but if you really want criticism then id say its missing some text. Try and find a cool font and write your name or something.

schoolboy · **Posted:** August 12th, 2010, 8:10 pm

Eh, i suck at text, so i dont even bother.

ilethaldose · **Posted:** August 12th, 2010, 8:17 pm

Im sure you can find a nice font and throw in your name. Give your self some credit for all of the hard work!

Ice · Runite: 9/30/2010

V2 is definitely more mysterious because the clothes are dark like the background. I like it better

I feel that text isn't absolutely necessary because the image makes a statement by itself. If you do it right, a lot of the time text isn't necessary to make a signature look great (e.g. Killjoy4eva's sigs)

AsianTurtle · **Posted:** August 13th, 2010, 5:59 am

Not as good as the older one...

Adbot · **Posted:** August 13th, 2010, 5:59 am

Duke Juker · RSBandB Donor since 07/01/2010

I love that game. But on topic. I like the first sig. The second one stands out a bit much with the emphasized coloration. The top one definitely gets my vote. Can't say anything bad about it really.

Edit: Left out word.

Killjoy · **Posted:** August 14th, 2010, 12:01 am

Nice to see your working with the effects. ;-)

Jaden · **Posted:** August 14th, 2010, 8:57 pm

This looks great. The first version is better. The render's right arm is a tad too bright in the second version. Try www.dafont.com for good fonts, then practice working with effects and whatnot.

-_+ totojimbob +_- · **Posted:** August 14th, 2010, 9:20 pm

Needs text on the left to fill it out. Other than that, very very well done.

Humus · **Posted:** August 16th, 2010, 8:45 am

Ahh I used to goggle at the people who made those stretched lines-y sigs

*coughs* anyway, I think the second is better, though a little bit too contrasted. Hmm, haven't got too much crit to give really. There isn't really much depth, just altair and then the background. Adding proper levels of depth in a tag looks crazy-good if done properly, so always think about the different levels of detail you can add-- think about foreground as well as middle ground (altair) and background (grungy lines stuff), though when you do this take care not to obstruct the render/stock.

Anubis · **Posted:** August 17th, 2010, 12:03 pm

Gonna have to agree and also say the second is better than the first purely because of the different colours present in the sig. Without the contrast, the sig looks bland. I think with the next sig you should experiment with custom brushes and create a background with colours from the render. I do think though that this render would have worked better in a lighter signature due to the amount of white on his costume.