Runescape Bits & Bytes :: View topic

You've used the C4Ds really well. The darker blue on the right behind him gives it a good sense of direction and coupled with the kind of sparky C4Ds in the middle it adds quite a nice flow. Some points, though:
1. The orangy-red on the left completely clashes with the rest of the sig!
2. Though I quite like the text effect, it seems like its not bold enough, or at least it should be moved down a tad
3. Its quite empty, feels like there should be something filling the space in the middle. Effects like the ones on the right would look good. Like shock waves or something.
4. The render is quite sharp and gritty looking, whereas the C4Ds don't look very strong. Looks like a few too many were set to lighten or overlay, if you know what I mean.

5. Border!! Why does everyone use those goddamn low-opactity borders? xD

If I sound like being a bit harsh; I am

, but critique helps you improve.

Author:	Sev [ May 31st, 2009, 8:13 am ]
Post subject:	Ghost
Woo, something I can proud of! First time using C4Ds! Didn't use a single brsuh. Woo. I think the end result came out very good and better than I expected. C n' C please?

Author:	Adbot [ May 31st, 2009, 8:13 am ]
Post subject:	Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear

Author:	Humus [ May 31st, 2009, 10:08 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
You've used the C4Ds really well. The darker blue on the right behind him gives it a good sense of direction and coupled with the kind of sparky C4Ds in the middle it adds quite a nice flow. Some points, though: 1. The orangy-red on the left completely clashes with the rest of the sig! 2. Though I quite like the text effect, it seems like its not bold enough, or at least it should be moved down a tad 3. Its quite empty, feels like there should be something filling the space in the middle. Effects like the ones on the right would look good. Like shock waves or something. 4. The render is quite sharp and gritty looking, whereas the C4Ds don't look very strong. Looks like a few too many were set to lighten or overlay, if you know what I mean. 5. Border!! Why does everyone use those goddamn low-opactity borders? xD If I sound like being a bit harsh; I am , but critique helps you improve.

Author:	Sev [ May 31st, 2009, 9:10 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
Humus wrote: You've used the C4Ds really well. The darker blue on the right behind him gives it a good sense of direction and coupled with the kind of sparky C4Ds in the middle it adds quite a nice flow. Some points, though: 1. The orangy-red on the left completely clashes with the rest of the sig! 2. Though I quite like the text effect, it seems like its not bold enough, or at least it should be moved down a tad 3. Its quite empty, feels like there should be something filling the space in the middle. Effects like the ones on the right would look good. Like shock waves or something. 4. The render is quite sharp and gritty looking, whereas the C4Ds don't look very strong. Looks like a few too many were set to lighten or overlay, if you know what I mean. 5. Border!! Why does everyone use those goddamn low-opactity borders? xD If I sound like being a bit harsh; I am , but critique helps you improve. Why not at all my good sir! I do deeply appreciate your comments! ...*******... What? Anyways v2. Edit: V2.1

Author:	Slimppu [ June 1st, 2009, 2:02 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
Humus wrote: 5. Border!! Why does everyone use those goddamn low-opactity borders? xD Because they're cool!

Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/

Ghost https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=74759	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Humus [ June 1st, 2009, 8:03 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
Sev wrote: Why not at all my good sir! I do deeply appreciate your comments! ...*******... What? Anyways v2. Edit: V2.1 Funny because I could've sworn you said "C n' C please?".. If you can't take critisism then why ask?

Author:	Sev [ June 1st, 2009, 8:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
Humus wrote: Funny because I could've sworn you said "C n' C please?".. If you can't take critisism then why ask? I know it's funny because I was being sarcastic! I didn't even take your comment as mean and I was just.. being sarcastic I suppose?

Author:	Adbot [ June 1st, 2009, 8:56 am ]
Post subject:	Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear

Author:	ChrisT [ June 1st, 2009, 9:50 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
vs 2.1 looks alot better then the first post. fade to black is nice, the explosion is better with lower opac., and actually can make out ghost this time very nice sig

Author:	Jaden [ June 4th, 2009, 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
the area around the person's face looks a little too saturated (if that's even the right term) but it's certainly not something that you should worry about or change. nice job anyways!

Author:	Kenny [ June 5th, 2009, 10:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Ghost
Sev wrote: Humus wrote: Funny because I could've sworn you said "C n' C please?".. If you can't take critisism then why ask? I know it's funny because I was being sarcastic! I didn't even take your comment as mean and I was just.. being sarcastic I suppose? I think I just facepalmed Humus. I thought you were English, the kings of sarcasm. Anywho, I really like your signature, but I prefer V1 tbh.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 7 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/