1 Stone Pwn wrote:
He has the freedom to say it, A&E has the freedom to fire him for it. Simple as that.
Actually....no.
Title VII of the Act, codified as Subchapter VI of Chapter 21 of title 42 of the United States Code, prohibits discrimination by covered employers on the basis of race, color, religion, *** or national origin (see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2[40]). Title VII applies to and covers an employer "who has fifteen (15) or more employees for each working day in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year" as written in the Definitions section under 42 U.S.C. §2000e(b). Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, ***, or national origin. An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.
By law, A&E
cannot discriminate against him. I suppose you could argue 'personal views' is not in the verbage, but then you could also argue that this falls under religion or ***.
A&E has
added fake bleeps and cut the name of Jesus in the show before, this is not the first time they have tried to shun him or the family.
GQ are the ones that
asked the question, knowing full well the repercussions it would cause.
Actual quote for those who haven't read it wrote:
Interviewer: What, in your mind, is sinful?
Phil: “Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,” he says. Then he paraphrases Corinthians: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers—they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”
Backstory: During Phil’s darkest days, in the early 1970s, he had to flee the state of Arkansas after he badly beat up a bar owner and the guy’s wife. Kay Robertson persuaded the bar owner not to press charges in exchange for most of the Robertsons’ life savings. (“A hefty price,” he notes in his memoir.) I ask Phil if he ever repented for that, as he wants America to repent—if he ever tracked down the bar owner and his wife to apologize for the assault. He shakes his head.
Phil :“I didn’t dredge anything back up. I just put it behind me.”
Backstory: As far as Phil is concerned, he was literally born again. Old Phil—the guy with the booze and the pills—died a long time ago, and New Phil sees no need to apologize for him:
Phil: “We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”
The
Robertson Family said they can't see the show continuing without Phil, the patriarch of the family, at the helm. Either A&E is going to lose the hottest show on TV, or they will eat their words and follow the money. LGBT are not going to pay what the Duck Dynasty show brings in, so it is
financially smarter for A&E to side with the Robertsons - regardless of anyone's views.
BTW, A&E
did not make the Robertsons, they were doing videos and such before A&E picked them up. Willie is actually the one that started working to get them on TV because their friends all suggested they should. With the amount of fans the Robertsons have, they could easily start a Youtube channel - and it may very well be the most watched channel on youtube.
And just as a little note: A&E has already
lost 6.3m viewers since last week due to their little charades. To put it in perspective, that's over 70%.
Gotta go for now. It will certainly be interesting watching this battle unfold.
)
