| Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/ |
|
| Do we need nucs? https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=47078 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Lucy [ March 14th, 2007, 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Do we need nucs? |
Ok, England are umming and arring about wether we need to replace our nuclear weapons. But do we really need to when he have much more important things to buy? The program would cost 20billion, thats enough to build and fund 33 new state of the art hospitals.. my question is this, Since im english..And english history etc.. Do we (england) need to even have nuclear wepons, or is our reputation and popularity good enough to keep us safe? |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ March 14th, 2007, 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Cowboyofdeath [ March 14th, 2007, 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Not really, they can trust the USA and other allies to defend them in case they are overwhelmed. |
|
| Author: | Whitefire9 [ March 14th, 2007, 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh yea, Just throw it all on us why dontcha? Were already in 1 war. |
|
| Author: | CreepyPirate [ March 14th, 2007, 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Popularity, lol. And we can't trust the USA to do a thing for us, they never have done anything for us it's always been the other way around, if they give us those missiles to defend our borders like we've been asking, that'll be the first thing they've done for us in this so called "alliance". We need nukes for now, until other country's stop arming themselves with it then we should keep them. |
|
| Author: | Mikhail [ March 14th, 2007, 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Eh england should buy nukes from russia, they have tons of em i hear...Otherwise as for Nukes they will just tear the worlds apart.... |
|
| Author: | Cowboyofdeath [ March 14th, 2007, 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nah, actually we should all leave in peace and forget anything nuclear forever. (That includes you, Iran) |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ March 14th, 2007, 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Lucy [ March 14th, 2007, 5:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Whitefire9 wrote: Oh yea, Just throw it all on us why dontcha? Were already in 1 war.
True, you killed some of our troops in iraq, if we trusted america to defend us what would it be..... "Uh, mr bush, we sent of one of our nucs, its gonig to hit england, im sorry?" |
|
| Author: | Kyle [ March 14th, 2007, 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Your a small island, China's air force has more soldiers then your entire military. Yes you need nucs... |
|
| Author: | Mikhail [ March 14th, 2007, 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well, I don't think Nucs will help much, here, but Russian Spec Ops will kick your asses without Nucs.....Nucs will only cause havoc and catastrophe, |
|
| Author: | Mushroom Queen [ March 14th, 2007, 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The notion of peace is wonderful, but it leaves powerful countries vulnerable. I don't see the US or England getting rid of nuclear weapons anytime soon. |
|
| Author: | Rune Beast0 [ March 14th, 2007, 7:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't think most countries have nukes with the intention of using them, it is like a bluff. "America has a nuke, we will blow you up if you try to attack us" kind of thing, not "Let's blow all our enemies up". If a country was nuked it would send the world into a total nuclear wasteland, as all that country's allies would whip out the nukes and nuke the attacking country. So they're kind of there as a precaution, kind of like 2 guys with guns. If Guy Number 1 tries to shoot Guy Number 2, he will shoot back, and all Number 2's friends will run in and shoot Number 1. The nukes kind of keep everyone at bay, prevent any disaster from happening. Anyway, like I was saying, I think you guys should get nukes, just as that precaution. |
|
| Author: | Pat [ March 14th, 2007, 8:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Despite all optimistic views, nuclear weaponry are essential to not only a country's reputation, but they're survival. The assumption that the US will back England up in a crisis is absurd. England can only fend for itself. |
|
| Author: | The Unknown Man [ March 14th, 2007, 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
As said in the movie Lord of War, nuclear weapons aren't the weapons of mass destruction but the bullets inside a Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947 or commonly know as the AK-47. Nuclear weapons sit away and don't do much. The bullets from AK-47 have claimed more lives then the nuclear weapons theat destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6-9 in 1945. So I don't see the need for nuclear weapons. |
|
| Author: | The Haysta [ March 14th, 2007, 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nukes are just there to frighten off countries. I doubt they will be used in the short term. |
|
| Author: | The Killer [ March 14th, 2007, 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Iran just wants to use nuclear energy not for war :/ I don't understand why other countries except the US and England are not allowed nuclear technology, I know North Korea is communist but what about the rest? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|