| Runescape Bits & Bytes https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/ |
|
| High Score List https://www.rsbandb.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=46726 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Starsaber [ March 7th, 2007, 9:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | High Score List |
Has anyone noticed how high of levels you need for most skills in order to be on the high score list? I think it's really time for Jagex to add more spots on the high score lists? Currently the top 1000000 people in a skill (above level 30) are on the list. Here are the levels of the person at rank 1 million for each skill that has that many people ranked. Attack - 60 Defense - 53 Strength - 61 (Highest) Hitpoints - 59 Ranged - 47 Prayer - 38 Magic - 50 Cooking - 55 Woodcutting - 58 Fletching - 30 (only p2p skill with 1 million ranked) Fishing - 55 Firemaking - 41 Crafting - 42 Smithing - 45 Mining - 55 |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ March 7th, 2007, 9:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Christopher [ March 7th, 2007, 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: High Score List |
UltStarsaber wrote: Has anyone noticed how high of levels you need for most skills in order to be on the high score list? I think it's really time for Jagex to add more spots on the high score lists?
Currently the top 1000000 people in a skill (above level 30) are on the list. Here are the levels of the person at rank 1 million for each skill that has that many people ranked. Attack - 60 Defense - 53 Strength - 61 (Highest) Hitpoints - 59 Ranged - 47 Prayer - 38 Magic - 50 Cooking - 55 Woodcutting - 58 Fletching - 30 (only p2p skill with 1 million ranked) Fishing - 55 Firemaking - 41 Crafting - 42 Smithing - 45 Mining - 55 I like it. It makes all those swiftswitch users who look up your stats while you are pking, obselete...because your pure doesn't have any stats on the high score list. I would prefer Jagex began pruning their player base. It is getting way too large and there are multitudes of multi accounts from macroers. |
|
| Author: | The Haysta [ March 7th, 2007, 11:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think it is nice that it is getting higher. SwiftSwitch is now against the rules again, due to direct linking to RS Pages. |
|
| Author: | Christopher [ March 8th, 2007, 12:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Agent Waffles wrote: I think it is nice that it is getting higher. SwiftSwitch is now against the rules again, due to direct linking to RS Pages.
That won't stop people from using it... |
|
| Author: | The Killer [ March 8th, 2007, 5:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
meesekiller wrote: Agent Waffles wrote: I think it is nice that it is getting higher. SwiftSwitch is now against the rules again, due to direct linking to RS Pages. That won't stop people from using it... Version 2.37 ftw. |
|
| Author: | Anubis [ March 8th, 2007, 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This isn't a discussion about SS, it's against the rules so get over it. (Also I believe any discussion on breaking RS rules is also breaking rsbandb rules.) - I hated getting my mining and smithing up to get them in the highscores, Mining at 55 is due to auto-nubs. Without Auto's I'd guess at about 47. |
|
| Author: | Adbot [ March 8th, 2007, 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Register and login to get these in-post ads to disappear |
| Author: | Warren [ March 8th, 2007, 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What ever happens, I don't care. I think it should show everyones levels no matter what level, but have the rank say that their not good enough in the skill to have a rank. I think they should split it up though. A seperate hiscores for members, one for F2P, and one thats everybody. |
|
| Author: | Christopher [ March 8th, 2007, 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Anubis wrote: This isn't a discussion about SS, it's against the rules so get over it. (Also I believe any discussion on breaking RS rules is also breaking rsbandb rules.)
- I hated getting my mining and smithing up to get them in the highscores, Mining at 55 is due to auto-nubs. Without Auto's I'd guess at about 47. Mining isn't that hard...it is just boring...if you don't have a problem with boring skills...you won't have a problem with mining. |
|
| Author: | James [ March 8th, 2007, 2:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
u have o be over 30 ina stat to be ranked |
|
| Author: | Warren [ March 8th, 2007, 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
mainiacks wrote: u have o be over 30 ina stat to be ranked
You do realise hes saying they should raise the amount of people in the hiscores for a stat from 1 million to something higher? |
|
| Author: | Starsaber [ March 8th, 2007, 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
mainiacks wrote: u have o be over 30 ina stat to be ranked
And in the top 1 million. That's why I only listed the skills that had 1 million ranked players. |
|
| Author: | Whitefire9 [ March 8th, 2007, 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
All stats on list, FTW. Well I think if they made the list any bigger, Jagex will become more lagged due to the memory that will take up to remember over 24 million names (1 million for each skill and 1 million for overall.) |
|
| Author: | Jamie [ March 8th, 2007, 4:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I like it at those levels. It makes we want to keep leveling so that I can get on there, and since it's rather high now, then it'll help me train my char. |
|
| Author: | Jaden [ March 8th, 2007, 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think they should increase the rank level to 2 million. |
|
| Author: | xOhYax [ March 8th, 2007, 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I know you can have 50 str and attk and not be ranked. good for pures and stakers... |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|